Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Kong Enterprise vs. Layer7 API Management and other solutions. Updated: May 2020.
419,052 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
In our buying companies' perspective, it was easier to use compared to other platforms. The markets were pretty familiar with the solutions.
This is a solid intrusion prevention system that combines a firewall and antivirus in a single solution.
A big win for CA was the expertise of the local country support plus having support staff on site in a matter of hours, if required.
This improved our organization, because it gives the management data to discuss for the next course of action and it suggests what to work on, as the next thing.
I work for an information security company. CA API Management is capable of using tokens for authorization to manage access control for the APIs.
As an organization grow, you can use CA API Management for authentication purposes through the CA API Gateway. It allows for multiple identity providers with different Active Directories.
The solution helped us to quickly publish and monetize APIs. I have used versioning responses to publish or send APIs to different customers with different versions.
From a security standpoint, it works great. It is the right solution for us. It's lightweight, a software-appliance configuration which was easy to deploy and configure.
There are a few assertions which are built-in for threat protection. I have used them for vulnerabilities, like for DDoS attacks, XML schema validation, IP restriction, and for cross-domain.
Containerization and the monetization module are quite unique for an API tool... In addition, the development time and rollout time are pretty quick.
There should be an easier way to integrate with other solutions, even though it's the same API solution layer. Comparability will be a good improvement.
The OS upgrades are not as frequent as they should be and they are bulky.
The Portal lacks maturity. Since the move from Portal 3.x to 4.x, a lot of features were removed. It is slowly coming back. I can see a lot of changes are done in the "background" to decouple components and make it more flexible. Those changes are just not getting to the UI side quick enough.
From the last version, they have added more dashboard support, but there is still a lot they need to improve. In terms of monitoring, it's almost all covered. The interface can be improved, though.
One specific feature that we need is the ability to authenticate directly to the server with API data. It's not complex nowadays. This is a feature that we need and CA doesn't have it.
They need a workflow for the API Developer Portal, where the process only allows requests to go to the correct person.
The implementation of CA API Management was complex. It is a complicated solution. You have to know so much IT knowledge to do the implementation.
The entire lifecycle management approach needs improvement: from the API management, development, deployment, some of the settings around the quotas, and some security policy applications, etc. for the APIs. We found the Apigee platform a lot more robust in that area.
There are old algorithms that the tool does not support - and it shouldn't, in my opinion. But sometimes customers need old algorithms, from old use cases and old applications, migrated to the platform. At those times, there are hiccups that happen.
The security protocols in CA's product, for financial services, weren't as good as those in API Connect.
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
Keep in mind the non-product licensing, e.g., if you opt not to use the embedded SQL.
If you do a TCO of more than five years, then you will see a big jump in costs for some vendors.
APIs can be developed to provide security. We can show them in one single pane of glass, such as the CA API Management API Developer Portal. It is there that we can provide the monetization for their APIs and what is happening on third-party applications, like Paytm or BookMyShow.
CA API Management has a licensing path. If you want more features, it requires more licenses and more installation time.
It has a reasonable pricing model by instance.
For what we are after, the pricing is okay. It is competitive.
We weren't comfortable with the pricing of licensing. It was slightly more expensive than its competitors.
I do not have experience with the pricing or licensing of the product.
out of 36 in API Management
Average Words per Review
out of 36 in API Management
Average Words per Review
Compared 27% of the time.
Compared 22% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 31% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Also Known As
|CA API Management, CA Live API Creator, Espresso Logic, CA API Gateway|
Kong delivers a next generation API platform built for modern architectures. With a lightnight-fast, lightweight, and flexible core, Kong delivers sub-millisecond latency across all your services. Kong's is deployment-, vendor-, and pattern-agnostic, allowing you to run your services how you want, where you want, and with who you want - from baremetal to cloud, monolith to microservices, service mesh, and beyond.
To compete successfully and thrive today, enterprises across every industry need to transform. This process is not just about incremental improvement, but about evolving core businesses to meet the demands of today’s connected world.
CA API Management accelerates this digital transformation by providing the capabilities you need to bring systems together, secure these integrations, deliver better customer experiences faster and capitalize on new opportunities.
Read more at http://www.ca.com/api
Learn more about Kong Enterprise
Learn more about Layer7 API Management
|Cargill, Zillow, Ferrari, WeWork, Healthcare.gov, Yahoo! Japan, Giphy, SkyScanner||Alaska Airlines, The Advisory Board Company, Amerigroup, IceMobile, R+V Versicherung, U.S. Army - plus hundreds of other customers in the banking, energy, finance, healthcare, government, manufacturing, transportation and retail sectors.|
Software R&D Company36%
Comms Service Provider16%
Financial Services Firm28%
Software R&D Company30%
Financial Services Firm11%
No Data Available