• Home
  • Kong Enterprise vs. PokitDok

Kong Enterprise vs PokitDok comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Kong Logo

Kong Enterprise

Read 18 Kong Enterprise reviews
13,943 views|10,542 comparisons
89% willing to recommend
PokitDok Logo

PokitDok

52 views|34 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
API Management
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Kong Enterprise and PokitDok based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Google, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in API Management.
To learn more, read our detailed API Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
AmitKanodia
Provides role-based access control and can be easily customized with Lua script
Use PokitDok?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The licensing fees are paid yearly."
  • "The price is really reasonable compared to that of alternative solutions."
  • "There are many factors that influence the price of Kong Enterprise, such as scale, licenses, and usage."
  • "I don't have any information on licensing costs currently."
  • "There is a need to pay towards the licensing charges...In some areas, the functionalities are available free of charge."
  • "Kong Enterprise's pricing is at par compared to the other technologies."
  • "Kong Enterprise is cheaper than Apigee. I rate its pricing as four out of ten."
  • "Kong Enterprise's pricing is reasonable for our company size."

    • More Kong Enterprise Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    How does Kong Enterprise compare with Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager?
    Top Answer:The Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager was designed with its users in mind. Though it is a reasonably complex piece of software, it is easy to install and upgrade. While there are different things that one… more »
    What do you like most about Kong Enterprise?
    Top Answer:The tool's feature that I find most beneficial is rate limiting. In our usage, especially in the financial sector, we prioritize limiting API usage. This is crucial because we provide APIs to other… more »
    Read all 14 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Kong Enterprise?
    Top Answer:Kong Enterprise needs to improve its pricing, which starts at hundreds of thousands of dollars. Pricing should be based on API usage rather than monthly. It should improve its documentation as well.
    Read all 14 answers   →
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    6th
    out of 64 in API Management
    Views
    13,943
    Comparisons
    10,542
    Reviews
    12
    Average Words per Review
    417
    Rating
    7.8
    51st
    out of 64 in API Management
    Views
    52
    Comparisons
    34
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Kong
    PokitDok
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Kong delivers a next generation API platform built for modern architectures. With a lightnight-fast, lightweight, and flexible core, Kong delivers sub-millisecond latency across all your services. Kong's is deployment-, vendor-, and pattern-agnostic, allowing you to run your services how you want, where you want, and with who you want - from baremetal to cloud, monolith to microservices, service mesh, and beyond.

    The PokitDok API allows you to transmit X12 transactions, schedule appointments into a number of EMRs, as well as search our curated databases of healthcare providers, procedure pricing, medical procedure codes, and more. The API is designed according to REST (Representational State Transfer) principles. The API uses JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) for requests and responses, and also allows batch processing of ASC X12 5010 compatible EDI files. All API traffic is encrypted over HTTPS and authentication is handled with OAuth2.

    Sample Customers
    Cargill, Zillow, Ferrari, WeWork, Healthcare.gov, Yahoo! Japan, Giphy, SkyScanner
    The Huffington Post, TechCrunch, Xconomy, MIT Technology Review
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm40%
    Computer Software Company27%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Insurance Company13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Insurance Company6%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business30%
    Large Enterprise70%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise70%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    API Management
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Google, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in API Management. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Kong Enterprise is ranked 6th in API Management with 18 reviews while PokitDok is ranked 51st in API Management. Kong Enterprise is rated 7.8, while PokitDok is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Kong Enterprise writes "Provides role-based access control and can be easily customized with Lua script". On the other hand, Kong Enterprise is most compared with Microsoft Azure API Management, WSO2 API Manager, Apigee, MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager and Apache APISIX, whereas PokitDok is most compared with .

    See our list of best API Management vendors.

    We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.