Compare Kong Enterprise vs. TIBCO Mashery API Management
Kong Enterprise is ranked 8th in API Management with 1 review while TIBCO Mashery API Management is ranked 16th in API Management with 1 review. Kong Enterprise is rated 8.0, while TIBCO Mashery API Management is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Kong Enterprise writes "A combination firewall and anti-virus solution that is dependable and easy to deploy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TIBCO Mashery API Management writes "Has the ability to have different packages based on the API keys but the setup is complex". Kong Enterprise is most compared with WSO2 API Manager, Apigee and Microsoft Azure API Management, whereas TIBCO Mashery API Management is most compared with Apigee, Microsoft Azure API Management and CA API Management.
 |
Most Helpful Review | |||
| Use TIBCO Mashery API Management? Share your opinion. | ||
 Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, Google, Seeburger and others in API Management. Updated: February 2020. 397,082 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |||
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros | |
This is a solid intrusion prevention system that combines a firewall and antivirus in a single solution. | The most valuable feature is the ability to have different packages based on the API keys. The same core system can have different packages based on different environments. |
Cons | |
The OS upgrades are not as frequent as they should be and they are bulky. | The way agile life cycle is working needs improvement. I also want to see more support for open API standards. I want to see some improvement on the protocol transformation. That is quite missing now. These are the three main issues. |
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs. 397,082 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Ranking  | |
Views 3,724 Comparisons 3,301 Reviews 1 Average Words per Review 838 Avg. Rating 8.0 | Views 2,710 Comparisons 2,092 Reviews 1 Average Words per Review 610 Avg. Rating 7.0 |
Top Comparisons | |
 Compared 27% of the time.  Compared 26% of the time.  Compared 15% of the time. | Compared 34% of the time. Compared 11% of the time.  Compared 11% of the time. |
Also Known As | |
| Mashery API Management | |
Learn | |
| Kong | TIBCO |
Overview | |
Kong delivers a next generation API platform built for modern architectures. With a lightnight-fast, lightweight, and flexible core, Kong delivers sub-millisecond latency across all your services. Kong's is deployment-, vendor-, and pattern-agnostic, allowing you to run your services how you want, where you want, and with who you want - from baremetal to cloud, monolith to microservices, service mesh, and beyond. | TIBCO Mashery Enterprise is a modern API platform for digital business that covers the entire API lifecycle. |
Offer | |
Learn more about Kong Enterprise | Learn more about TIBCO Mashery API Management |
Sample Customers | |
| Cargill, Zillow, Ferrari, WeWork, Healthcare.gov, Yahoo! Japan, Giphy, SkyScanner | uShip, Sabre, TouchTunes, Best Buy, Cisco, Comcast, athenahealth, Coca-Cola Enterprises, CentralIndex.com, Constant Contact, Edmunds.com, FoodEssentials, Getty Images, Klout, Rovi, Rotten Tomatoes, Sportradar, TomTom, ACTIVE.com |
Top Industries | |
Software R&D Company40% Comms Service Provider15% Real Estate/Law Firm7% Outsourcing Company5% | No Data Available |
Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, Google, Seeburger and others in API Management. Updated: February 2020.
397,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See also Kong Enterprise Reviews, TIBCO Mashery API Management Reviews, and our list of Best API Management Companies.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post
reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference
with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.