"It is a scalable product."
"The valuable feature I have found to be the management of Kubernetes clusters in a private cloud or public clouds, such as Azure or Google Cloud Platform."
"The initial setup is complicated. Although Kuma has its own CLI, CTL, and they say to use their CLI, if I have to build a generic solution, my personal preference would be to use Helm or another similar solution other than Kuma. If you have your own library CLI, it becomes hard for others to adopt it. For example, if I have to write some automation, infrastructure automation, I can't just use Kuma. I have to change my code to use Kuma's CTL, which is unfair because it doesn't make sense. It doesn't fit with my current automation structure. I have to do something extra, something additional, which I really don't like."
"VMware Tanzu Service Mesh could add better integration with other cloud platforms, such as vRealize Automation or VMware vCloud Director for cloud providers."
Earn 20 points
Kong Mesh is ranked 3rd in Service Mesh with 1 review while VMware Tanzu Service Mesh is ranked 8th in Service Mesh. Kong Mesh is rated 6.0, while VMware Tanzu Service Mesh is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Kong Mesh writes "Provides a unique advantage by offering a global view for all workloads and clusters within the mesh but lack of a robust community for open-source support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware Tanzu Service Mesh writes "Reliable, effective Kubernetes management, and good technical support". Kong Mesh is most compared with Istio, Envoy, HashiCorp Consul, Traefik Enterprise and NGINX Service-Mesh, whereas VMware Tanzu Service Mesh is most compared with Istio, HashiCorp Consul, Envoy, NGINX Service-Mesh and Buoyant Linkerd.
See our list of best Service Mesh vendors.
We monitor all Service Mesh reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.