We performed a comparison between Temenos Quantum and Xamarin Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Mobile Development Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."You can do rapid development across multiple platforms."
"The main benefit lies in its exceptional speed of implementation."
"I like the complete, professional social site."
"It is an important solution for reducing the development efforts by developing a mobile application efficiently, in a shorter period of time, across multiple platforms, such as Android and iOS."
"Its greatest advantage lies in its exceptional security and robustness."
"You can build your own customized, native, mobile applications in an efficient matter."
"The best feature is the Kony Studio, which is the product that is used to develop interfaces."
"Comparing other solutions with Temenos Quantum, the later is less mature and presents several issues. Implementing Temenos Quantum has been challenging, resembling a nightmare compared to the smoother experience with the other."
"The most valuable features are: One language for all platforms: C#; XAML for UI in Xamarin.Forms; provides 100 percent coverage of APIs on each platform."
"It has significantly reduced the skill barrier for development and testers."
"It is a true native solution, and we can use the cross-platform framework."
"Xamarin Platform enables you to use a single code language. This is beneficial for Android, iOS, and Windows platforms, so they can be developed over application or built over application."
"The combination of forms for cross-platform UI and C-Sharp for the programming language are my two favorite features."
"I think the best part about Xamarin is that you can create apps for both platforms using one source code. That's the most powerful feature. When you develop something for Android, it also builds for iVerse as well. The cross-platform aspect of Xamarin is unique. The ability to develop both apps with a single code base is something very unique."
"Xamarin.Forms reduced the effort and time to build and market our solution, market our features, and get our solution into production."
"Cross-platform development saves time and provides consistencies."
"When developing our application, we also encountered certain issues related to delays and time-consuming builds."
"We would like to have widgets for graphs and analytics, as well as the integration of machine learning."
"Using the API manager can be complicated when you're dealing with multiple teams, projects, and APIs. Quantum doesn't have user-based access, so I can't restrict parts of the project to specific users."
"One area where Temenos Quantum could improve is in the flexibility of widgets and additional libraries."
"There are many issues when integrating with native sides when building an Android application of the retail accelerator or an iOS application of the retail actuator. We have to incorporate on the native side of things, which creates a lot of issues. Temenos Quantum is a proprietary product and not open source. There is not much information available on the internet for developers to reference when solving issues. You have to contact the help desk, who will then give you an appointment and work to resolve the issue. In terms of what Temenos can do better, they can make the product more mature so that we do not encounter as many black holes when encountering an issue."
"It would be highly beneficial if future iterations of Temenos could incorporate support for QR-based payment methods, as it would enhance the platform's capabilities and align it more closely with modern payment trends"
"The security and the interface technology could be better in Temenos Quantum. Additionally, a module that can display all the activities that have been done in the system would be helpful."
"The technology of the solution needs an update. It is deficient in terms of connectivity."
"The file size is a bit big, so you have to make certain layers."
"The android application compilation time needs to be reduced."
"The solution struggles a little bit with binding libraries."
"I would like to see hot reload, similar to what Flutter has out-of-the-box. There is "Live Reload" but it’s still in preview and was only recently announced."
"The solution always has room for improvement with price, integration, stability, and documentation."
"We need to think about partnering with IBM because there is a need for a big data partner; someone who has machine learning and can help us connect the app to big data."
"There is limited support for UX widgets."
"I feel that the Android AppCompat library creates a lot of issues. A lot of development time is often wasted solving these issues."
Temenos Quantum is ranked 9th in Mobile Development Platforms with 15 reviews while Xamarin Platform is ranked 5th in Mobile Development Platforms with 37 reviews. Temenos Quantum is rated 7.2, while Xamarin Platform is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Temenos Quantum writes "Though a secure tool for building applications, there is a need to improve its stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Xamarin Platform writes "It's about to be retired and replaced with an inferior product, but offers excellent cross-platform development capabilities". Temenos Quantum is most compared with OutSystems, Mendix, ServiceNow and Microsoft Azure App Service, whereas Xamarin Platform is most compared with Appium, Ionic, OutSystems, Apple Xcode and Mendix. See our Temenos Quantum vs. Xamarin Platform report.
See our list of best Mobile Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Mobile Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.