• Home
  • Kronos Workforce Central Software [EOL] vs. MHR iTrent

Kronos Workforce Central Software [EOL] vs MHR iTrent comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Benefits Administration
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Kronos Workforce Central Software [EOL] and MHR iTrent based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Workday, Oracle, SAP and others in Benefits Administration.
To learn more, read our detailed Benefits Administration Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
We've been able to bring all payroll functions back in-house, although the implementation online training classes...
We were using an outside payroll company and decided to bring everything in-house. We wanted to own our own data for any use we wanted and instant... Read more →
Anonymous User
A scalable solution with good functionalities, but customer support needs to improve
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It's really easy to use and has a simple interface."

More Kronos Workforce Central Software [EOL] Pros →

"MHR iTrent's functionality and the payroll part are good."

More MHR iTrent Pros →

Cons
"The networking could use improvement."

More Kronos Workforce Central Software [EOL] Cons →

"Customer support and getting help from MHR iTrent are not great at all."

More MHR iTrent Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The price is expensive."

    • More Kronos Workforce Central Software [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Benefits Administration solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    What do you like most about MHR iTrent?
    Top Answer:MHR iTrent's functionality and the payroll part are good.
    What needs improvement with MHR iTrent?
    Top Answer:Customer support and getting help from MHR iTrent are not great at all. MHR iTrent concentrates too much on sales, like a selling mechanism. They don't concentrate on helping their existing clients… more »
    What is your primary use case for MHR iTrent?
    Top Answer:We use the whole integrated payroll HR system. I'm more on the payroll side. They do not host us, but we host ourselves.
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Benefits Administration
    17th
    out of 65 in Benefits Administration
    Views
    371
    Comparisons
    258
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    217
    Rating
    6.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Kronos Manager
    MidlandHR iTrent, iTrent
    Learn More
    UKG
    MHR
    Overview
    The Kronos Workforce Central® suite of workforce management solutions are purpose-built for your industry to help drive business outcomes by engaging your employees, controlling labor costs, increasing productivity, and minimizing compliance risk. Manage your workforce on a proven cloud platform that is secure, scalable, and mobile — allowing you to do business when or where you choose to access its power.

    iTrent is a single, web based HR, payroll, talent management and workforce planning solution supporting latest operational methodologies for managing people. From organisational planning, attraction and selection, to pay, performance management, learning and development, and retention. iTrent helps align people to organisational goals, develop talent to support future requirements and release the true value of your people.

    Sample Customers
    Finish Line, Rock Bottom
    Brighton and Hove City Council, Cafcass, Capel Manor College, Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS, City and Islington College, City West Housing, Coventry University, Denbighshire County Council, Dudley College, Dyfed Powys Police Force, East Durham College
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company24%
    Government17%
    Manufacturing Company17%
    Retailer6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization22%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Government11%
    Real Estate/Law Firm9%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise6%
    Large Enterprise79%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise67%
    Buyer's Guide
    Benefits Administration
    March 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Workday, Oracle, SAP and others in Benefits Administration. Updated: March 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Kronos Workforce Central Software [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Benefits Administration while MHR iTrent is ranked 17th in Benefits Administration with 1 review. Kronos Workforce Central Software [EOL] is rated 7.2, while MHR iTrent is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of Kronos Workforce Central Software [EOL] writes "We've been able to bring all payroll functions back in-house, although the implementation online training classes were slow". On the other hand, the top reviewer of MHR iTrent writes "A scalable solution with good functionalities, but customer support needs to improve". Kronos Workforce Central Software [EOL] is most compared with , whereas MHR iTrent is most compared with SAP HCM, Oracle HCM Cloud, Workday, Access PeopleXD and SAP SuccessFactors.

    See our list of best Benefits Administration vendors and best Cloud HCM vendors.

    We monitor all Benefits Administration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.