We performed a comparison between SumTotal Systems Talent Portal [EOL] and UKG based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Workday, Oracle and others in Talent Management."System usability has improved to a large extent and our manual effort has been reduced."
"The solution's UI is good. Also, it is very easy to use."
"It is much easier to use and the customer service is better than our previous solution."
"I have found the most valuable feature to be business intelligence and Cognos reporting."
"The employee self-service feature is most valuable. This is the restaurant industry, and they have a mobile app that allows employees to go in and manage their data. So, employees can manage direct deposit accounts, emergency contacts, and other things in the app. That's definitely the biggest benefit."
"The fact that I can see the whole HR information in a single point is valuable. There is a unified view of everything, which is good. Previously, we had many different systems for each part of the information. Now, it is all centralized. It is very good."
"The most valuable feature is being able to get time management reports which break out reclassified jobs and departments to separate areas of the company. This allows for better tracking of hours spent in certain jobs and where more hours may be needed."
"It enables us to manage the system ourselves. We don't need an additional team to do a lot of maintenance and add the things that we want."
"The solution has improved our organization by helping us cut hours and lessen our labor force. It saved us probably over $100,000 in just the last couple of years."
"Analytics is one area where this system really needs a large improvement because currently, it has only basic reporting features."
"One area where UKG could improve is in its ability to understand its own competency and then work hard to improve it."
"The solution could use better reporting with standard reports. We use the Cognos platform in BI for a lot of our reporting. However, they need to have more robust standard reporting available to their user base."
"I would like to see more functionality in the next release to be able to get hours and dollars per calendar month rather than just by payroll in the Business Intelligence reports."
"Reporting is always a hurdle for any user just because it is so extensive. They provide a lot of out-of-the-box reports, but it is something that you always need to work on because you need more advanced writing of reports."
"UKG could be a little more flexible in some areas."
"The navigation on the screen could be better. Sometimes, I have to dig a little bit deep to find what I need. Everything is there. It just needs to be a little bit smoother."
"I would like the capability to use UKG as a single platform without the need to alternate between systems."
"Certainly, the time and attendance and the payroll integration need a lot of work. They are disjointed pieces, and they don't work smoothly together. That's the main drawback."
More SumTotal Systems Talent Portal [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
SumTotal Systems Talent Portal [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Talent Management while UKG is ranked 7th in Talent Management with 117 reviews. SumTotal Systems Talent Portal [EOL] is rated 8.0, while UKG is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of SumTotal Systems Talent Portal [EOL] writes "A customizable, end-to-end solution for Performance Management, Learning, and Succession Planning ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of UKG writes "A solution with the capability to integrate seamlessly with other third-party applications". SumTotal Systems Talent Portal [EOL] is most compared with , whereas UKG is most compared with Workday, SAP SuccessFactors, PeopleSoft, SAP HCM and Dayforce HCM.
See our list of best Talent Management vendors.
We monitor all Talent Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
