We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Kryon RPA vs. SAP Contextor

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Kryon RPA Logo
9,340 views|4,607 comparisons
SAP Contextor Logo
2,510 views|1,865 comparisons
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about UiPath, Automation Anywhere, Microsoft and others in Robotic Process Automation (RPA). Updated: November 2021.
552,407 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"Kryon will allow you to automate processes fast and easy and you do not need to be a developer to automate processes.""We have been using Kryon Process Discovery for about a year now. With our initial tests and monitoring just a couple people, we were able to identify 79 possible use cases within a one-month period.""Attended automation has diverted 34 percent of training calls to our tech support centers.""The bot is typically about twice as fast as a person and more accurate, as long as the data going in is good. That is the biggest advantage.""We use Kryon Studio to develop new wizards and we use the features to capture elements from the screen and automate processes... The screen capture allows us to interface with systems which don't have an API, or where the API is very expensive, and it allows us to do on-screen integration.""The thing that we find the most value in is the Process Discovery component and the ability to really see what users are doing on a day-to-day basis. We're starting to make sense of the processes that they're doing and getting visibility into what they're doing. Overall, the Process Discovery is very good."

More Kryon RPA Pros »

"Contextor is a good solution for a Citrix environment. It's the first with this tool. Other tools provide the same functionality, but not with the Citrix environment."

More SAP Contextor Pros »

Cons
"The only unstable part is Studio where you build this stuff. In our version, the 5.25. It has a memory leak. If you leave it open for too long, eventually it just freezes. Saving your work, closing, and opening it just once a day is all it takes. However, this is a bug that I have noticed about the stability of the actual tool.""It could be more reliable in spying HTML.""With the customer support, there have been some times where we have had to go through explaining the issue a couple times because it has gone through a couple of people's hands. There have been a couple of scenarios where we have had to re-explain the issue and bring somebody new up to speed on what is going on or what the problem is.""I have seen some very minor occurrences where Kryon's interactions with Microsoft Office might cause the robot to hang. However, it is about one to two percent of the time where we are seeing this happen. It is such a small percentage that it's not even something that we are overly worried about. This would be where they might have some stability issues, but it could be the Microsoft Office API or how they are interacting together.""We have found some difficulties regarding the integration with legacy systems where the screen has elements in the Hebrew language. The connection to Hebrew, right-to-left systems, is more challenging.""The product requires some more time in development. It still has some bugs and some things to work out. They're constantly releasing. They need to continue working out the general issues of using the product at scale, first and foremost."

More Kryon RPA Cons »

"I would like to see a better capacity for unstructured data, for example, PDF, or text within images."

More SAP Contextor Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"We are probably saving $6000 to $8000 a month in labor costs. It's not a ton, but we're right around $60,000 to $80,000 a year with our current deployment.""They license per robot and we have 25 robots. You get so many robot licenses and can allocate those licenses to either attended, unintended, or Process Discovery bots. If you have 25 licenses, for example, you could have 20 automation bots and five process discovery. This allocation is flexible. There are also maintenance costs.""We're paying in the neighborhood of about $66,000 a year. The cost is fairly similar to its competitors' costs. It might have been a little bit more reasonable than the others, and that cost was with Process Discovery in addition."

More Kryon RPA Pricing and Cost Advice »

"This is not a tool or software with a license as others are. The SaaS model is based on the usage of the tool."

More SAP Contextor Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions are best for your needs.
552,407 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Hi, currently we are working RPA in an insurance company. One of the processes we're working to automate is auditing the parameters of the policy transactions being proactive not reactive. The other… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
9,340
Comparisons
4,607
Reviews
6
Average Words per Review
1,978
Rating
8.8
Views
2,510
Comparisons
1,865
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
692
Rating
8.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
The Leo Platform
Contextor
Learn More
Overview

The Kryon RPA Platform sets the standard for secure, scalable and cost efficient robotic process automation management and optimization. It’s also among the most business-user friendly platforms on the market.

Contextor’s RPA technology relieves business software users from performing repetitive tasks and enables both attended and unattended RPA within and across applications. To date, Contextor’s customers have deployed more than 100,000 bots automating business processes.

Offer
Learn more about Kryon RPA
Learn more about SAP Contextor
Sample Customers
HPE
BNP Paribas, Societe Generale, Kabel Deutschland, Orange, Carrefour
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm50%
Insurance Company13%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
Recruiting/Hr Firm6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company30%
Comms Service Provider20%
Financial Services Firm9%
Manufacturing Company5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company36%
Comms Service Provider18%
Manufacturing Company8%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business5%
Midsize Enterprise38%
Large Enterprise57%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business27%
Midsize Enterprise39%
Large Enterprise34%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about UiPath, Automation Anywhere, Microsoft and others in Robotic Process Automation (RPA). Updated: November 2021.
552,407 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Kryon RPA is ranked 5th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 5 reviews while SAP Contextor is ranked 20th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 1 review. Kryon RPA is rated 9.0, while SAP Contextor is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Kryon RPA writes "The tool helps with speed to market, efficiency, and accuracy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Contextor writes "Good OCR functionality, runs well in a Citrix environment, and the technical support is good". Kryon RPA is most compared with UiPath, Blue Prism, Automation Anywhere (AA), Microsoft Power Automate and Software AG ARIS Robotic Process Automation, whereas SAP Contextor is most compared with UiPath, Automation Anywhere (AA), Blue Prism, WinAutomation by Softomotive and Redwood Business Process Automation - Finance Edition.

See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.

We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.