Compare Kryon RPA vs. UiPath

Kryon RPA is ranked 4th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 18 reviews while UiPath is ranked 1st in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 292 reviews. Kryon RPA is rated 8.4, while UiPath is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Kryon RPA writes "The tool helps with speed to market, efficiency, and accuracy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of UiPath writes "Easy to use: People with zero technical background can scale up in a matter of weeks and build bots". Kryon RPA is most compared with UiPath, Blue Prism and Automation Anywhere (AA), whereas UiPath is most compared with Automation Anywhere (AA), Blue Prism and WorkFusion. See our Kryon RPA vs. UiPath report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Automation Anywhere (AA) Logo
44,070 views|17,346 comparisons
Kryon RPA Logo
4,680 views|2,298 comparisons
UiPath Logo
Read 292 UiPath reviews.
44,625 views|25,886 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Kryon RPA vs. UiPath and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
382,547 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The most valuable features of this solution are its scalability, security using the credential vault, and ease of use for business.The advantage of Automation Anywhere is that you don't necessarily have to come from a programming background.We have improved on IQ Bot collectively with the normal Taskbot that we use. How it got started was that we have a lot of scanned documents to input for our solution. So, I used to get a lot of scanned documents, and extracting or reading the data from those has always been a pain area. We always used to bring a manual person in to do it. Once a manual person did that activity, it was brought into Excel where I could run the bot. With the entry of IQ Bot, it now takes care of my scanned documents, which means IQ Bot does the OCR extraction and gives my data to the Automation Anywhere Taskbot. This means no manual intervention and end-to-end bot processing, along with a happy customer at the end of the day. We provide these services to multiple clients, so we have been doing this for all of our clients.From an SAP point of view, we have in-built features. They have integrated everything together, so it's much easier for us to use that.The technical support is good. If it is required that they provide their resources, they will send their resources to your organization to support you in terms of development and technical support.Since our implementation, I can vouch for the fact that it is very easy to use. You do not need to know a lot of coding, even the business users, who have virtually no idea of coding, can easily operate it. They can run their bots and have the analysis ready for higher management. This is something which provides a great ease of use, and also in part why it is scalable.What really helps RPA to grow is the cognitive part of it. That's where the product is really good. Initially, it started out as RPA, but now there is a cognitive aspect to it. That's a key value to it.It save us time and provides ROI as a monetary benefit because it reduces FTE, the number of headcount working for a particular project.

Read more »

The thing that we find the most value in is the Process Discovery component and the ability to really see what users are doing on a day-to-day basis. We're starting to make sense of the processes that they're doing and getting visibility into what they're doing. Overall, the Process Discovery is very good.Attended automation has diverted 34 percent of training calls to our tech support centers.We have been using Kryon Process Discovery for about a year now. With our initial tests and monitoring just a couple people, we were able to identify 79 possible use cases within a one-month period.As a business user, it's so easy to use. With the recording of the processes, we didn't need to hire a specific developer... we are able to build most of our processes without having to develop the actual development skillset... the simplicity is the biggest win.We took a very complex business area, and every activity in it which can be done automatically is being replaced by the robot instead of people working on it.The advanced Excel functionalities are really convenient because we work a lot with spreadsheets. It’s also easy to use the HTML selectors. It’s just a click and it picks it up. There’s not a lot of no hard-coding with it.The recording capability is valuable because of the amount of data it captures automatically. It's quite good. It means less development, and fewer configuration settings to fill in after you're done.Troubleshooting and debugging could be improved. It's missing a proper debugger. It's very difficult, based on the log files and the fact that it doesn't have a proper debugger, to troubleshoot issues. It will sometimes end with no indication as to why it ended and it becomes a bit of trial and error.

Read more »

The most valuable features are PDF, Excel automation, and web scraping.The most valuable features of this solution are that it is powerful and easy to use.The most valuable feature of this solution is the training that is available.Compared to other solutions, training is very valuable. You can easily access the resources. There is a community edition which is a plus and something that other tools don't offer. Accessibility is the best feature.We're able to handle some of our tax and HR processes, the volumes of the documents or new hires at a tremendous speed compared to how we used to do it manually in the past.The product helps achieve efficiency that will create ROI and the training and support are very good.An example of how this product has improved the way our organization functions is that it has doubled the number of records that we process per hour.Unattended robots completely take tasks out of the user's hands reducing error and unnecessary effort on mundane tasks.

Read more »

Cons
Better use case management to prevent each development from scratch would be an improvement.Because we are very new to our process, so we're still sort of working through it.I would like a couple more features where I can talk and the line comes up automatically. I can just put on a mic, like in "Ok Google". With "Ok Google", I can tell it to please open an Excel spreadsheet with the header read. If this is there, then I don't even need to sit on a computer, I can just dictate my commands and it will automatically come up.We have in-house, a few variables, which we use from technical perspectives. We don't have them in Automation Anywhere, but they introduced them yesterday.The initial setup was not that great. The road was very up and down. We struggled. A lot of the features were not compatible with applications which we are using. That was the reason. This was the initial days, we are talking about 2016 to 2017. The buzz was not as much as we are having now.The initial setup was quite complex. We have faced an issue. During the initial implementation stages, it took longer than we expected. It affected our timelines to a certain extent.Technical support needs to be much faster. I also had the project delivery. I had six clients whom I looked after. Whenever we got stuck, it was all about sprinting. There was a two or three week sprint. Within that, if you just wait for two to three days, it doesn't make sense. The support needs to implode, because I was just talking to a customer now who came directly and asked us, "Can you give us a dedicated support team?" It's feedback from our customer that support takes too long.I suggest that they add some features in dashboard, where you can say, "These type of features are things that people like more." You want to add those to your project and showcase them to the client so they will be happier. Because you know what features people like if you give a suggestion, that is good for everyone.

Read more »

The product requires some more time in development. It still has some bugs and some things to work out. They're constantly releasing. They need to continue working out the general issues of using the product at scale, first and foremost.I have seen some very minor occurrences where Kryon's interactions with Microsoft Office might cause the robot to hang. However, it is about one to two percent of the time where we are seeing this happen. It is such a small percentage that it's not even something that we are overly worried about. This would be where they might have some stability issues, but it could be the Microsoft Office API or how they are interacting together.With the customer support, there have been some times where we have had to go through explaining the issue a couple times because it has gone through a couple of people's hands. There have been a couple of scenarios where we have had to re-explain the issue and bring somebody new up to speed on what is going on or what the problem is.At first, we had problems with the object detection but in this latest release it has been better, and I think it keeps getting better.What we are lacking is OCR, the ability to read text. We would like it to have the ability to take a page which is free text and analyze it, and then for the robot to know what to do next. This ability does not exist in Kryon products.We use Google Drive a lot. If somebody sends us a spreadsheet or a document, it's going to be in Google’s format. It's not going to be in Microsoft Office format. But currently, there's no integration with Google’s documents. That would be a huge plus to have.When a project is very big, a lot of memory is taken up. Then, machines don't have enough memory. This could be improved upon to be more efficient.Another major drawback is OCR. We are not able to read scanned documents correctly in a reliable way. There is always some margin of error. Some of the processes require us to read scanned documents, and you need to ensure that it is 100 percent accurate. Without that level of assurance, you can't automate such tasks.

Read more »

The emailing and integration with self-service BI systems are areas that need improvement.The operations need to be improved.I would like to see more features included in the AI Fabric.It interacts with so many products that the robot itself becomes unstable.I think in the Studio, as in building automations, it takes a lot of clicks and there's a lot of options and I think sometimes there's just too much. It should be more simplified on the user interface.Incorporating more in the way of machine learning and AI would extend the capabilities of the product.We have had some problems with processing errors, but these are largely due to our legacy system and UiPath is working to help resolve the issue.While it is still the best, the usability for end-users without programming experience can be improved.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
If we talk about the automation RPA. it definitely has worked very well for us. I'm talking about giving good savings, about more than 180 FTE savings, after implementing more than 200 plus bots. It has worked well. As an organization, it has supported us very well, and also for our customers.It saves on the quality of work, because the quality can be bad when somebody's doing it. If a bot does the work, it's faster and comes with good quality. These are two important things along with the cost saving in the long run. That's where the value is.We have seen ROI on one of the process, but not on the other processes yet.The licensing cost is approximately $4,000 USD, which is a seed license.The certifications are free of cost.There are a lot of savings in terms of effort and time as well as costs. Automation Anywhere automates a lot of processes. It allows an organization to save the efforts of a lot people. It saves a lot of time because people can't work a whole day (24/7), but Automation Anywhere bots can.We are interested in saving manual engineer man-hours. So far, we have saved $100,000.Our company is investing a lot of money in Automation Anywhere. They have saved money wherever humans are working. They invest a lot of money in FTEs and other logistics, so the money saving is very pretty good with Automation Anywhere. While I don't know the exact figure, the tool is saving us millions of dollars as well as saving about 40,000 hours in the last year.

Read more »

We're paying in the neighborhood of about $66,000 a year. The cost is fairly similar to its competitors' costs. It might have been a little bit more reasonable than the others, and that cost was with Process Discovery in addition.Can't beat the price... There are different pricing levels for every bot or unattended bot. You can buy however many you want. You'll need an additional virtual machine for it to work on.They license per robot and we have 25 robots. You get so many robot licenses and can allocate those licenses to either attended, unintended, or Process Discovery bots. If you have 25 licenses, for example, you could have 20 automation bots and five process discovery. This allocation is flexible. There are also maintenance costs.We are probably saving $6000 to $8000 a month in labor costs. It's not a ton, but we're right around $60,000 to $80,000 a year with our current deployment.We've more than broken even over on the license. Year to date, we are at $120,000 in savings.Licensing costs are about $100,000 a year without any additional costs.We have been able to alleviate two FTEs, which was a big savings for us. We were able to reuse those resources in other locations. It is over 5000 hours a year in total savings.In addition to the standard licensing costs, there are manpower costs.

Read more »

Unattended bots are more valuable than attended bots.Attended is fairly cheap. Anytime you bring in Orchestrator, that starts to become a little more expensive. I'm a little concerned about all the new SKUs that are coming in and the products associated with them. I am really interested in finding out if someone wanted a full product suite, what kind of money are they looking at annually.The licensing fees for this solution are $8,000 USD annually.I don't know the cost. Maybe $25,000 for the year. I would definitely say it's worth the money.The licensing fees for this solution are approximately $100,000 USD annually.Right now we only have a couple of Studio licenses and a couple of bots, so we're at about $8,000 USD per year.We have 200 licenses for bots in production and pay between $200,000 and $300,000 per year currently.Our licensing fees are approximately $140,000 USD annually, which includes all of the bots, Orchestrator, and the Studio.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions are best for your needs.
382,547 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Top Comparisons
Compared 61% of the time.
Compared 54% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 41% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Also Known As
Automation Anywhere, Testing Anywhere, Automation Anywhere EnterpriseThe Leo Platform
Learn
Automation Anywhere
Kryon Systems
UiPath
Overview

Automation Anywhere is the world’s largest provider of robotics process automation (RPA) software and the pioneer of the intelligent digital workforce. Over 1600 of the world’s leading enterprises deploy 1,000,000+ bots on the Automation Anywhere platform to automate their business processes in banking, finance, insurance, technology, telco, logistics and other sectors. Automation Anywhere has a global reach with 1600 employees and 500+ global partners that deliver products and services in over 90 countries.

The Kryon RPA Platform sets the standard for secure, scalable and cost efficient robotic process automation management and optimization. It’s also among the most business-user friendly platforms on the market.

Built for both business and IT, UiPath is the leading platform for Enterprise Robotic Process Automation (RPA).

UiPath is recognized worldwide for product leadership and technical excellence. With the largest development team in the industry, we are dedicated to continuously deliver innovation year-round to accelerate your value from automation.

Offer
Learn more about Automation Anywhere (AA)
Learn more about Kryon RPA
Learn more about UiPath
Sample Customers
Google, Linkedin, Cisco, Juniper Networks, DellEMC, Comcast, Mastercard, Quest DiagnosticsHPEThomas Reuters, GE, Lufthansa, NASA, Autodesk, Equifax, Airbus, Fujifilm, HP
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm29%
Manufacturing Company14%
Software R&D Company11%
Pharma/Biotech Company10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company34%
Financial Services Firm13%
Comms Service Provider9%
Manufacturing Company5%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm50%
Insurance Company13%
Healthcare Company6%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company29%
Comms Service Provider12%
Wholesaler/Distributor8%
Healthcare Company7%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm22%
Manufacturing Company7%
Energy/Utilities Company7%
Insurance Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company28%
Financial Services Firm9%
Comms Service Provider9%
Retailer9%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business9%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise81%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business9%
Midsize Enterprise19%
Large Enterprise72%
REVIEWERS
Small Business5%
Midsize Enterprise40%
Large Enterprise55%
REVIEWERS
Small Business19%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise63%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise16%
Large Enterprise71%
Find out what your peers are saying about Kryon RPA vs. UiPath and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
382,547 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email