We performed a comparison between LambdaTest and Tricentis Tosca based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Test Automation Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The real devices feature is the most valuable feature for us."
"Stability-wise, I have not experienced any downtime or other performance issues."
"Builds that took days to complete with in-house infrastructure were executed in a couple of hours."
"The Docker tunnel integration for local testing can be extremely useful to run on multiple instances in parallel."
"The most valuable features are that it's essentially on-demand, and you only focus on getting the code that needs to be executed without having to worry about the OS, hardware, etc."
"Our test execution time was reduced to 16 mins from five hours when executed in parallel on multiple VMs. This has been extremely helpful!"
"This product offers out-of-the-box geolocation testing in automation, which is amazing!"
"In case something goes wrong at LambdaTest end, the Support team is extremely responsive to analyze any platform-related issues."
"You can quickly build automated testing, manage it, and have it run on a regular basis to ensure that there are no issues."
"What I find valuable is that Tricentis is always refining the test methodology. They listen to feedback from the analysts about what the testing tool should do, and then Tricentis always implements it. So all the necessary testing functions are already implemented in their tools."
"Compared to other tools we have been looking at, you don't have to be a programmer to operate it, though it helps. It also a product that can be used by business people."
"The solution has plenty of features compared to other solutions."
"This solution is easy to use for everybody, including those who are not IT-educated."
"Multiple scanning engines to automate many different applications."
"The item that is different from all the other tools is that it's module based."
"The most valuable feature of Tricentis Tosca is the Tosca Commander. Functionality is another thing I find most valuable in the solution."
"Responsive testing UI is a bit cluttered, whereas the LT browser is much better to use."
"The scalability is good with Amazon, but IBM had some issues."
"LambdaTest needs to have native application testing, which would be a great help to my team."
"I've also had some issues with the speed of certain API calls and the rendering of data. For example, when I'm onboarding data, the process can be slow."
"You cannot perform native-app testing, as they offer simulation for web testing only."
"I feel that the automated screenshot testing takes a little longer on MacOS sometimes."
"Improvements on a platform need to happen on a timely basis...There should be some new features coming up or some performance improvisation over a period of time."
"Load flow compared to other stacks needs improvement."
"I would like to see more implementation of AI on the self-healing aspect. That would be like the next step."
"I think the downside would be licensing costs which are very high."
"Might have a learning curve, as it does not follow the traditional Record-Play functionality, but tests have to be built from requirements or Agile story cards."
"I would like to see better integration with other testing tools."
"What needs to be improved in Tricentis Tosca is its centralized repository mechanism because it's not as flexible. The repository in the solution where you store the data and the script for test automation is quite an old-fashioned mechanism that could be improved."
"The UI does not have the option of automating the scroll bars."
"First, Tricentis could improve Tosca's Linux scripting. We can automate Linux scripting, but there are a few commands that Tosca doesn't support. DVS support and the object identification mechanism could also be better."
"Tricentis Tosca could improve on its mobile automation solution."
LambdaTest is ranked 15th in Test Automation Tools with 18 reviews while Tricentis Tosca is ranked 1st in Test Automation Tools with 96 reviews. LambdaTest is rated 9.0, while Tricentis Tosca is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of LambdaTest writes "Cost-effective, good integration, and parallel testing leads to good performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis Tosca writes "Does not require coding experience to use and comes with productivity and time-saving features ". LambdaTest is most compared with BrowserStack, Sauce Labs, Katalon Studio, Perfecto and Bitbar, whereas Tricentis Tosca is most compared with OpenText UFT One, Katalon Studio, Worksoft Certify, Postman and SmartBear TestComplete. See our LambdaTest vs. Tricentis Tosca report.
See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors, best Functional Testing Tools vendors, and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
