We performed a comparison between LambdaTest and Visual Studio Test Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Functional Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The slow nature of a cloud platform was compensated with parallel testing, and now we are able to finish our testing job faster than it was before COVID."
"LambdaTest easily integrates with leading project management, bug tracking, and CI-CD tools like Jira, Asana, Jenkins, Circle CI, and more."
"LambdaTest offers geolocation testing in automation, which is amazing!"
"In case something goes wrong at LambdaTest end, the Support team is extremely responsive to analyze any platform-related issues."
"It is a scalable solution."
"The Docker tunnel integration for local testing can be extremely useful to run on multiple instances in parallel."
"The support docs are precise and you can get started with them easily."
"Our test execution time was reduced to 16 mins from five hours when executed in parallel on multiple VMs. This has been extremely helpful!"
"The tool is flexible and easy to manage. We use it since it is scalable and easy to use. It integrates with solutions."
"The interface is easy to use."
"The most valuable features are the SSIS reports, the deployment models, and the ability to interact with other Microsoft tools."
"The debugging feature is valuable."
"Visual Studio is an exemplary integrated development environment that stands out due to its exceptional features. It allows for the seamless selection of the appropriate programming language for the specific development tasks at hand. This facilitates a swift and effortless transition between languages, providing a highly efficient development experience."
"The stability has always been very good."
"The most valuable features are tools like IntelliSense and ReSharper."
"The most valuable feature has been to store all our packages in one place including SSIS packages, SQL tables, TFS and SSR."
"LambdaTest needs to have native application testing, which would be a great help to my team."
"Their smart testing module needs improvement."
"I would like to see all of the features available in the freemium plan so that I can test them."
"I feel that the automated screenshot testing takes a little longer on MacOS sometimes."
"You cannot perform native-app testing, as they offer simulation for web testing only."
"I've also had some issues with the speed of certain API calls and the rendering of data. For example, when I'm onboarding data, the process can be slow."
"I think Lambdatest is a valuable tool for our team and things that have room for improvement would be mobile app testing, as it can be an important addition to the tool."
"Mobile application testing will be an added benefit for us if LambdaTest implements this really soon."
"The service right now is far too expensive. You need to pay per user."
"It could be available for multiple platforms and other operating systems like Mac with a native port."
"We would like to be able to easily integrate this solution with our continuous integration tools, such as Jenkins."
"The product must provide more integration."
"The solution should be cheaper."
"The tool crashes and has high memory consumption."
"One of the problems with this solution is you need to be highly technically skilled to operate it, it is not for everyone."
"Sometimes Visual Studio is slow. It uses a lot of resources like memory and processing power. You should optimize the performance by only installing what you need on your machine. Don't install unnecessary things that will slow your machine."
More Visual Studio Test Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
LambdaTest is ranked 14th in Functional Testing Tools with 17 reviews while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 8th in Functional Testing Tools with 46 reviews. LambdaTest is rated 9.0, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of LambdaTest writes "Cost-effective, good integration, and parallel testing leads to good performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Customization is a key feature as is the ability to integrate with third-party services ". LambdaTest is most compared with BrowserStack, Sauce Labs, Katalon Studio, Perfecto and Tricentis Tosca, whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with TFS, Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad, SmartBear TestComplete and OpenText UFT One. See our LambdaTest vs. Visual Studio Test Professional report.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.