LANDesk Systems Lifecycle Management [EOL] vs NetCrunch comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between LANDesk Systems Lifecycle Management [EOL] and NetCrunch based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Microsoft, ServiceNow and others in Server Monitoring.
To learn more, read our detailed Server Monitoring Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use LANDesk Systems Lifecycle Management [EOL]?
Reginald Pierre
Ranking
Unranked
In Server Monitoring
25th
out of 42 in Server Monitoring
Views
234
Comparisons
194
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Server Monitoring
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Microsoft, ServiceNow and others in Server Monitoring. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Systems Lifecycle Management
Learn More
AdRem Software
Video Not Available
Overview

Modernize your IT, satisfy growing user expectations, and manage all the devices users carry from a single, unified endpoint management solution. Update how you deliver applications to users through automated rollout projects and a self-service app store experience. LANDESK Management Suite is proven, reliable client management software that integrates with multiple IT solutions. You gain greater visibility into what devices you have and boost IT and user productivity.

NetCrunch is the complete network monitoring solution for monitoring traffic, topology, devices, systems, logs, and services. It's policy, and template-based configuration makes managing thousands of nodes a breeze. It automatically generates layer-2 maps and manages monitoring dependencies. NetCrunch supports major operating systems, virtualization platforms, and the Cloud. Complete SNMP support with 8,700+ MIBs included and a built-in MIB compiler.

Sample Customers
MBDA, Admiral Group, 21st Century Oncology, The Bunker, The MAC Services Group, Christopher Newport University, Derbyshire Health Informatics Services, Cegedim Outsourcing, RuffaloCODY, Apollo-Optik
AER Kooperation, AON Corpration, Advance Financial services, Airbus SAS, Bauer Net consult, Banco Soal, Bertelsmann, Burke County public, COF training services
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company20%
Comms Service Provider14%
Government9%
Financial Services Firm6%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business20%
Midsize Enterprise12%
Large Enterprise68%
Buyer's Guide
Server Monitoring
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Microsoft, ServiceNow and others in Server Monitoring. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

LANDesk Systems Lifecycle Management [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Server Monitoring while NetCrunch is ranked 25th in Server Monitoring. LANDesk Systems Lifecycle Management [EOL] is rated 0.0, while NetCrunch is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetCrunch writes "A network monitoring platform with a useful reporting feature, but permission-based options could be better". LANDesk Systems Lifecycle Management [EOL] is most compared with , whereas NetCrunch is most compared with Zabbix, PRTG Network Monitor and Fortinet FortiSIEM.

See our list of best Server Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Server Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.