Compare LANDesk Systems Lifecycle Management vs. SCCM
Most Helpful Review | |||
Use LANDesk Systems Lifecycle Management? Share your opinion. |
| ||
 Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Microsoft, Artica Soluciones Tecnologicas and others in Server Monitoring. Updated: January 2021. 455,301 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |||
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Server Monitoring solutions are best for your needs. 455,301 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Questions from the Community | |
Ask a question Earn 20 points | Top Answer: The most valuable features are application deployment and task-sequenced imaging. Top Answer: The operations could be faster and you need some patience with this tool. I wish that sending media to remote distribution points was faster. Top Answer: The primary uses are PC imaging, application deployment and updates, Windows patching, and baselining. |
Ranking  | |
Views 620 Comparisons 516 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A | Views 44,087 Comparisons 28,786 Reviews 20 Average Words per Review 488 Rating 8.2 |
Popular Comparisons | |
 Compared 10% of the time. |  Compared 22% of the time.  Compared 22% of the time.  Compared 6% of the time.  Compared 4% of the time.  Compared 4% of the time. |
Also Known As | |
| Systems Lifecycle Management | System Center Configuration Manager |
Learn | |
| Ivanti | Microsoft |
Overview | |
Modernize your IT, satisfy growing user expectations, and manage all the devices users carry from a single, unified endpoint management solution. Update how you deliver applications to users through automated rollout projects and a self-service app store experience. LANDESK Management Suite is proven, reliable client management software that integrates with multiple IT solutions. You gain greater visibility into what devices you have and boost IT and user productivity. | With System Center Configuration Manager, you can manage PCs and servers, keeping software up-to-date, setting configuration and security policies, and monitoring system status while giving your employees access to corporate applications on the devices that they choose. |
Offer | |
Learn more about LANDesk Systems Lifecycle Management | Learn more about SCCM |
Sample Customers | |
| MBDA, Admiral Group, 21st Century Oncology, The Bunker, The MAC Services Group, Christopher Newport University, Derbyshire Health Informatics Services, Cegedim Outsourcing, RuffaloCODY, Apollo-Optik | Bank Alfalah Ltd., Wªrth Handelsges.m.b.H, Dimension Data, Japan Business Systems, St. Lucie County Public Schools, MISC Berhad |
Top Industries | |
No Data Available | Financial Services Firm15% Insurance Company15% Computer Software Company15% Construction Company15% Computer Software Company28% Comms Service Provider16% Government9% Manufacturing Company4% |
Company Size | |
No Data Available | Small Business26% Midsize Enterprise24% Large Enterprise50% Small Business7% Midsize Enterprise8% Large Enterprise85% |
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Microsoft, Artica Soluciones Tecnologicas and others in Server Monitoring. Updated: January 2021.
455,301 professionals have used our research since 2012.
LANDesk Systems Lifecycle Management is ranked 20th in Server Monitoring while SCCM is ranked 2nd in Server Monitoring with 18 reviews. LANDesk Systems Lifecycle Management is rated 0.0, while SCCM is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of SCCM writes "Works well with Windows, very stable, and can scale well". LANDesk Systems Lifecycle Management is most compared with Tanium, whereas SCCM is most compared with Ansible, BigFix, Quest KACE Systems Management, Chef and Ivanti Patch for Windows.
See our list of best Server Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all Server Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.