Compare Lanetix LxCPG vs. Planview PPM Pro

Lanetix LxCPG is ranked 58th in Project Management Software while Planview PPM Pro is ranked 2nd in Project Management Software with 10 reviews. Lanetix LxCPG is rated 0, while Planview PPM Pro is rated 8.2. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Planview PPM Pro writes "Stable, visual tool that helps guide people through projects". Lanetix LxCPG is most compared with , whereas Planview PPM Pro is most compared with Planview Enterprise One, JIRA Portfolio and Planview Projectplace.
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Lanetix LxCPG Logo
58 views|38 comparisons
Planview PPM Pro Logo
1,767 views|901 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use Lanetix LxCPG? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Planview, Microsoft and others in Project Management Software. Updated: May 2020.
419,360 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
We have about 50 PPM Pro user licenses, so 50 team licenses. We have eight stakeholder licenses and 10 full user resource manager licenses in PPM Pro. We also have 60 Projectplace licenses. That runs us about $37,000 to $38,000 annually.The team users are about $480 per user, per year. The full user licenses are $900 or $950 per user, per year. The stakeholder licenses were $60 per user, per year. We don't have any requests users, but we have not instituted our intake process yet. However, I think request users don't cost an additional license.Because we have PPM Pro with Project place, we transitioned to the Flex model.We have their Flex plan.The cost was in line.$6 million has been the return on investment so far, and that was because of work intake. Now that we are scrutinizing the work intake and asking questions like, "Is there an alternative to your $10 million project?" We had one project come in for $10 million, scrutinize it through our gate review process, and wound up with the alternative, which was $3.8 million. So, a $6 million savings.

Read more »

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Management Software solutions are best for your needs.
419,360 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Average Words per Review
Avg. Rating
Average Words per Review
Avg. Rating
Top Comparisons
Compared 13% of the time.
Also Known As
LxCPG, Lx-CPGInnotas
Video Not Available

Collaborative Project Management SaaS solution to help teams move faster, collaborate better, improve project visibility and provide content in context of a project for teams wherever they work - desktop or mobile.

Planview PPM Pro provides a top down approach to project portfolio management (PPM) completely hosted in a secure cloud platform. Planview PPM Pro software provides visibility into your programs, projects, and people to enable visibility, alignment, and improved execution across your enterprise.

Learn more about Lanetix LxCPG
Learn more about Planview PPM Pro
Sample Customers
Bud Light, ABInBev, Michelob Ultra, Shock TopThe Weather Channel, corcs, Crayola, Scan Health Plan, Vermont, Bank of the West, North West Company, University of Southern Mississippi, Jeffries, Purdue University, Chesterfield County Virginia, City of Memphis
Top Industries
No Data Available
Financial Services Firm27%
Healthcare Company13%
Insurance Company13%
Pharma/Biotech Company13%
Software R&D Company34%
Financial Services Firm9%
Non Profit6%
Comms Service Provider6%
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Planview, Microsoft and others in Project Management Software. Updated: May 2020.
419,360 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.