Compare Laserfiche Rio vs. SharePoint

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Laserfiche Rio Logo
1,076 views|825 comparisons
SharePoint Logo
33,923 views|28,498 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, IBM, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: January 2021.
455,536 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"This is a very complete and powerful solution."

More Laserfiche Rio Pros »

"The workflow feature is valuable because it enables us to cascade responsibilities.""For any organization with more than one person in it, if they are trying to organize things to let people in the company know what others are doing, then this solution is good for them.""This solution has helped us with the categorization, organization, management, discovery, and delivery of program and project related information.""The most valuable features are the Integrations, web site, and search.""The online editing capabilities, file sharing, auditing, information security, ease of solution management, and the easy user adaptation to the platform are the most valuable features.""The most valuable features are the collaboration and sharing."

More SharePoint Pros »

Cons
"We would like to see more features for RPA and AI."

More Laserfiche Rio Cons »

"Workflow is something that can become more intelligent.""I would like a simpler, more cost-effective solution for connecting data sources with workflows and BI tools, or data mining tools.""This solution would benefit from the implementation of enhanced online forms and template development capabilities.""The areas of this solution that need improvement are the relationships between lists, cross-site web parts, and page-building tools.""The way to change the version of the files in SharePoint should be improved. The method of synchronizing files from local to cloud can also use improvement.""The workflow engine cannot support the business needs."

More SharePoint Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"The pricing works for us.""For this type of solution, it is not wise to buy it without Software Assurance."

More SharePoint Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
455,536 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
1,076
Comparisons
825
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
132
Rating
10.0
Views
33,923
Comparisons
28,498
Reviews
17
Average Words per Review
360
Rating
7.8
Popular Comparisons
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Also Known As
SharePoint 2007, SharePoint 2010
Learn
Laserfiche
Microsoft
Overview
Powerful Document Management Software and Agile Enterprise Content Management Solutions

SharePoint is a Microsoft-based platform for building web applications. It covers a widerange of capabilities and while it is appropriate for experienced webdevelopers, even non-technical minded users can easily navigate through thesystem and execute functions such as collaborating data, managing documents andfiles, creating websites, managing social networking solutions, and automatingworkflow.

Major areas that SharePoint deals with are websites,communities, content, search, insights, and composites. The purpose is to give usersthe ability to create or develop these key business components on their owneven without technical knowledge of, for example, how to build a website or howto integrate coding. Configuring SharePoint into a business's system is meantto cut out all of the complicated steps, and pave the way for easierimplementation all around.

Offer
Learn more about Laserfiche Rio
Learn more about SharePoint
Sample Customers
D.L. Evans, College of the Desert, Community Action, Tompkins County, Hanson McClain, Olmsted County, Old Line Bank, Steinhafels, CIRCOR Pibiviesse Toyota, Aeroports de Paris, ASBBank Ltd., Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals, CambridgeshireConstabulary, D&M Group, NPL Construction Company, and The Regional Municipality of Niagara.
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company33%
Comms Service Provider14%
Government11%
Media Company6%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm14%
Energy/Utilities Company10%
University10%
Comms Service Provider8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company25%
Comms Service Provider14%
Government11%
Manufacturing Company5%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business38%
Midsize Enterprise21%
Large Enterprise41%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business4%
Midsize Enterprise25%
Large Enterprise71%
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, IBM, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: January 2021.
455,536 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Laserfiche Rio is ranked 8th in Enterprise Content Management with 1 review while SharePoint is ranked 1st in Enterprise Content Management with 16 reviews. Laserfiche Rio is rated 10.0, while SharePoint is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Laserfiche Rio writes "A powerful solution that offers BPM and automation to assist with our digital transformation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SharePoint writes "Plan, plan, plan. Over-budget". Laserfiche Rio is most compared with Hyland OnBase, IBM FileNet, OpenText Content Suite Platform, Hyland Perceptive Content and OpenText Documentum, whereas SharePoint is most compared with WordPress, Citrix ShareFile, Box, OpenText Content Suite Platform and OpenText Documentum.

See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.