LAW PreDiscovery vs OpenText EnCase eDiscovery comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
LexisNexis Logo
310 views|192 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
OpenText Logo
549 views|431 comparisons
75% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between LAW PreDiscovery and OpenText EnCase eDiscovery based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery.
To learn more, read our detailed eDiscovery Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Jovana Pavlovic
Alejandro Stromer
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The sourcing and the detailed background checklist are the most valuable features of this solution."

More LAW PreDiscovery Pros →

"I like the processing feature on the product because it does everything at once, i.e, indexing, recovery, keyword searches, etc.""Data Recovery: Its ability to repair damaged partitions and uncover hidden partitions from within the tool, and allow further analysis.""The most important feature we've found is the Enscripts. That is one powerful feature that I, personally, love to use.""It indexes much faster, and is more reflexive because of the Enscripts.""It speeds up the process, so I can meet my deadlines.""The technical support is excellent.""The solution is very stable."

More OpenText EnCase eDiscovery Pros →

Cons
"If these details, photos, dates of birth, and so on are not possible to include, I believe it would be much more efficient if multiple people could log in using the same email address, as we can in some other programs."

More LAW PreDiscovery Cons →

"In the past, incident response time for tech support was slow.""We have come across problems with the end-case. We could not find an email discovery type of module and there was not flexibility with the email.""I would like to see a capability to ingest and absorb more data. That would be really good. It currently is lacking this function.""The reporting is a bit unreliable. It needs to be better.""​Sometimes the application can take more time to complete the image processing or fail at the end of the process.​""Ease of use and learning curve need improvement.""There were minor UI bugs."

More OpenText EnCase eDiscovery Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "​The product is affordable and user-friendly.​"
  • "EnCase is an affordable solution."
  • "We have a license. And, we found the cost high. We contacted them and talked to them about the ratio of the US dollar versus the Indian rupee and then we came to a solution."
  • "We have a license. And, we found the cost high. We contacted them and talked to them about the ratio of the US dollar versus the Indian rupee and then we came to a solution."
  • More OpenText EnCase eDiscovery Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which eDiscovery solutions are best for your needs.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The sourcing and the detailed background checklist are the most valuable features of this solution.
    Top Answer:They have a lot of these 100% matches with no details or sources for certain names that are very common in certain countries. It is difficult for us to determine whether or not it is that person… more »
    Top Answer:We use LAW PreDiscovery to perform required checks every time we receive KYC from our clients to see if they have any political affiliation or if they have any criminal background that we need to know… more »
    Top Answer:I rate the product’s pricing a five out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.
    Top Answer:We have experience in engineering and capital projects. It is an add-on to extend project and asset management documentation.
    Ranking
    8th
    out of 40 in eDiscovery
    Views
    310
    Comparisons
    192
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    1,062
    Rating
    8.0
    6th
    out of 40 in eDiscovery
    Views
    549
    Comparisons
    431
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    343
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    EnCase eDiscovery
    Learn More
    Overview

    LAW PreDiscovery software works as an all-in-one "eDiscovery engine" to scan, import, and produce all of the potential evidentiary documents needed during legal discovery. LexisNexis LAW PreDiscovery leads the way in document production, including the most flexible imaging and endorsing capabilities. Hundreds of file types exports directly to Concordance software and other leading document review platforms in a wide range of formats and Identifies and extracts content from file types, scan documents from scanners, and produce printed or digital output. LAW PreDiscovery handles even the largest imaging, endorsing, OCR, or print jobs by just adding additional workstations.

    eDiscovery collection tools address the rise in dispersed and remote workforces, the proliferation of mobile devices and new sources of data. Comprehensively collecting data across all data sources, including endpoints, such as desktops and laptops, is critical to defensibility. Collection analytics and culling is key to efficient digital investigations, narrowing the document collection to drive down the cost of legal review.

    With OpenText™ EnCase™ eDiscovery, organizations can streamline the collection, culling and preservation of data across diverse sources in a single efficient process.

    Sample Customers
    Murphy & King, BDO Consulting, Beasley Allen
    Ontario Ministry of Government, Aerospace Company, Chesterfield Police Department
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Legal Firm34%
    Government23%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Healthcare Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Legal Firm7%
    Energy/Utilities Company7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise59%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise29%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise75%
    Buyer's Guide
    eDiscovery
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery. Updated: April 2024.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    LAW PreDiscovery is ranked 8th in eDiscovery with 1 review while OpenText EnCase eDiscovery is ranked 6th in eDiscovery with 8 reviews. LAW PreDiscovery is rated 8.0, while OpenText EnCase eDiscovery is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of LAW PreDiscovery writes "Reliable, with a detailed and comprehensive checklist suitable for small businesses". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText EnCase eDiscovery writes "A stable and scalable hybrid solution with easy setup". LAW PreDiscovery is most compared with IPRO and Nuix eDiscovery, whereas OpenText EnCase eDiscovery is most compared with Nuix eDiscovery, CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) and kCura Relativity.

    See our list of best eDiscovery vendors.

    We monitor all eDiscovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.