Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] vs NEC Sigmablade-M comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] and NEC Sigmablade-M based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers.
To learn more, read our detailed Blade Servers Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Use NEC Sigmablade-M?
Ranking
Unranked
In Blade Servers
19th
out of 22 in Blade Servers
Views
45
Comparisons
38
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Blade Servers
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Blade Servers, IBM Blade Servers, x86 BladeServers
Sigmablade-M
Learn More
Lenovo
Video Not Available
Overview
Regarding Blade Servers, IBM is a pioneer in blade technology, building the legendary IBM reliability, security and performance into the efficient, flexible blade form factor. IBM continues to drive innovation in blade servers, offering a range of technologies to support the unique demands of your business Ð large or small, in virtually any industry.

The NEC SIGMABLADE-M is an 8-blade chassis that comprises 6U of rack space and offers a compact size that is ideal for mid-sized systems, easy monitoring of the status of each blade server, and better and easier cabling through the use of KVM switches.

Sample Customers
Merkl IT, Sanitas, Cnam, Generac Power, DIMAR Group, Comune di Messina
Sysmex Shanghai
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business42%
Midsize Enterprise33%
Large Enterprise25%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
Blade Servers
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Blade Servers while NEC Sigmablade-M is ranked 19th in Blade Servers. Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] is rated 8.2, while NEC Sigmablade-M is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] writes "Meets rigorus challenges however requires fair amount invesment ". On the other hand, Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] is most compared with , whereas NEC Sigmablade-M is most compared with .

See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.