Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] vs SGI Rackable Systems [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] and SGI Rackable Systems [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers.
To learn more, read our detailed Blade Servers Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Use SGI Rackable Systems [EOL]?
Ranking
Unranked
In Blade Servers
Unranked
In Blade Servers
Buyer's Guide
Blade Servers
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Blade Servers, IBM Blade Servers, x86 BladeServers
Rackable Systems
Learn More
Lenovo
Video Not Available
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Video Not Available
Overview
Regarding Blade Servers, IBM is a pioneer in blade technology, building the legendary IBM reliability, security and performance into the efficient, flexible blade form factor. IBM continues to drive innovation in blade servers, offering a range of technologies to support the unique demands of your business Ð large or small, in virtually any industry.

SGI Rackable standard-depth, rackmount servers and clusters deliver top value and performance, based on the winning combination of the latest Intel processor architectures and SGI expertise in designing and delivering the most advanced performance computing systems available. Rackable servers support up to 1.5TB of memory per node in an ultra-dense architecture with up to 88 cores per 1U. Add to this support for FDR and EDR InfiniBand, 22-core processors and DDR4 memory, and you have some of the most powerful cluster solutions available.

Sample Customers
Merkl IT, Sanitas, Cnam, Generac Power, DIMAR Group, Comune di Messina
DownUnder GeoSolutions (DUG), Tagged
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business42%
Midsize Enterprise33%
Large Enterprise25%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
Blade Servers
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Blade Servers while SGI Rackable Systems [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Blade Servers. Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] is rated 8.2, while SGI Rackable Systems [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] writes "Meets rigorus challenges however requires fair amount invesment ". On the other hand, Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] is most compared with , whereas SGI Rackable Systems [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.