• Home
  • Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] vs. Oracle Netra Modular System

Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] vs Oracle Netra Modular System comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Buyer's Guide
Blade Servers
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] and Oracle Netra Modular System based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers.
To learn more, read our detailed Blade Servers Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Meets rigorus challenges however requires fair amount invesment
Anonymous User
It's not a one-size-fits-all converged infrastructure system, which means that I can mix things and have convergence...
There's a lot benefits with the Netra. First, since it is an agile system, I can mix hypervisors. For free, you're going to get Oracle VM, which is... Read more →
Ranking
Unranked
In Blade Servers
22nd
out of 22 in Blade Servers
Views
34
Comparisons
19
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Blade Servers
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Blade Servers, IBM Blade Servers, x86 BladeServers
Learn More
Lenovo
Video Not Available
Oracle
Overview
Regarding Blade Servers, IBM is a pioneer in blade technology, building the legendary IBM reliability, security and performance into the efficient, flexible blade form factor. IBM continues to drive innovation in blade servers, offering a range of technologies to support the unique demands of your business Ð large or small, in virtually any industry.

Oracle’s Netra Modular System is a transformative platform for customers looking to build out their communications on-premises and cloud infrastructures. With extreme agility and scale in a platform that can be completely virtualized, customers benefit from accelerated development, rapid bring up, and low-cost maintenance. Netra Modular System takes today’s traditional bladed and rackmount architectures and merges them to create a new innovative best-of-breed next-generation platform. This integrated system is designed to handle compute, networking, and storage evolution without forklift upgrades. Netra Modular System provides the service and business agility required in today’s fast-paced market. 

Sample Customers
Merkl IT, Sanitas, Cnam, Generac Power, DIMAR Group, Comune di Messina
Ovum
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business42%
Midsize Enterprise33%
Large Enterprise25%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
Blade Servers
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Blade Servers while Oracle Netra Modular System is ranked 22nd in Blade Servers. Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] is rated 8.2, while Oracle Netra Modular System is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] writes "Meets rigorus challenges however requires fair amount invesment ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Netra Modular System writes "It's not a one-size-fits-all converged infrastructure system, which means that I can mix things and have convergence throughout the whole stack". Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Oracle Netra Modular System is most compared with .

See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.