LightCyber vs Microsoft ATA [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between LightCyber and Microsoft ATA [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Splunk, Cynet and others in User Entity Behavior Analytics - UEBA.
To learn more, read our detailed User Entity Behavior Analytics - UEBA Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "I believe we are looking into new licenses. They may be called the E5. Honestly, I don't have it on top of my mind, but I think it's around seven to $10 a user per month."
  • More Microsoft ATA [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Ranking
    Views
    361
    Comparisons
    35
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Unranked
    In User Entity Behavior Analytics - UEBA
    Buyer's Guide
    User Entity Behavior Analytics - UEBA
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Splunk, Cynet and others in User Entity Behavior Analytics - UEBA. Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Microsoft Advanced Threat Analytics, MS ATA [EOL]
    Learn More
    Overview
    LightCyber behavioral analytics from Palo Alto Networks enables organizations to stop active attackers and malware operating in the network. With LightCyber, attackers have nowhere to run and nowhere to hide. LightCyber leverages powerful behavioral analytics technology to learn expected user and device behavior and spot anomalous activity indicative of an attack. LightCyber's network-centric model catches attacks during every stage of the attack lifecycle, especially during the reconnaissance and lateral movement stages. Magna Pathfinder, an endpoint interrogation service, augments LightCyber's network-centric attack prevention by providing endpoint context to accelerate incident response. Magna Pathfinder identifies the executable on an endpoint that is responsible for an attack. The Magna Cloud Expert System then analyzes the executable to determine if it is malware, riskware or a rare artifact.
    Microsoft Advanced Threat Analytics (ATA) provides a simple and fast way to understand what is happening within your network by identifying suspicious user and device activity with built-in intelligence and providing clear and relevant threat information on a simple attack timeline. Microsoft ATA is an on-premises platform to help you protect your enterprise from advanced targeted attacks by automatically analyzing, learning, and identifying normal and abnormal entity (user, devices, and resources) behavior. It detects suspicious activities and malicious attacks with behavioral analytics, adapts to the changing nature of cyber-security threats, focuses on what is important with a simple attack timeline and reduces false positive fatigue.
    Sample Customers
    Migdal Capital Markets, Tel Aviv Stock Exchange, Orange Communications
    Turkish Airlines, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Empa, The Alberta Teachers' Association
    Buyer's Guide
    User Entity Behavior Analytics - UEBA
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Splunk, Cynet and others in User Entity Behavior Analytics - UEBA. Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    LightCyber is ranked 26th in User Entity Behavior Analytics - UEBA while Microsoft ATA [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in User Entity Behavior Analytics - UEBA. LightCyber is rated 0.0, while Microsoft ATA [EOL] is rated 6.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft ATA [EOL] writes "Easy to define rules but interface needs better granularity and only integrates well with other Microsoft solutions". LightCyber is most compared with , whereas Microsoft ATA [EOL] is most compared with .

    See our list of best User Entity Behavior Analytics - UEBA vendors.

    We monitor all User Entity Behavior Analytics - UEBA reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.