Compare Linode Object Storage vs. StackPath Object Storage

Linode Object Storage is ranked 20th in File and Object Storage while StackPath Object Storage is ranked 18th in File and Object Storage. Linode Object Storage is rated 0, while StackPath Object Storage is rated 0. On the other hand, Linode Object Storage is most compared with , whereas StackPath Object Storage is most compared with .
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
20th
Views
22
Comparisons
5
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
18th
Views
46
Comparisons
22
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Find out what your peers are saying about Pure Storage, Red Hat, SwiftStack and others in File and Object Storage. Updated: May 2020.
419,360 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Top Comparisons
Learn
Linode
StackPath
Video Not Available
Overview

Linode Object Storage is S3-compatible, highly available, and easily scalable storage for any of your backup, big data and data archiving needs. With Object Storage you do not need to have or use a Linode virtual machine to benefit from storing your files or expanding your capacity.

Why use StackPath Object Storage?
Frequent (hot) storage shouldn’t cost a lot. And once you’re paying for storage, we don’t believe you should pay AGAIN to access it. Welcome to StackPath’s Object Storage.

Save Money
50% cheaper than Amazon S3 or similar cloud storage providers.

No Data Transfer Fees
No charges for data transfer (egress) or API requests/calls.

High Performance
Better performance than cloud storage providers, even more so once paired with StackPath’s CDN or Edge Computing.

Performance
StackPath’s system architecture enables an average 6x faster performance relative to Cloud Storage Providers*. Especially when paired with our CDN or Edge Compute, this performance advantage means significantly faster time-to-first-byte speeds.

S3-Compatible
100% AWS S3 bit-compatible (same AWS API constructs for storage & identity management). No need to change your S3-compatible application.

Superior TTFB
Average time-to-first-byte (TTFB) performance of less than 15 ms; made even faster when paired with our CDN. This is significantly lower than others’ TTFB.

Immediate Read Capability
When you write an object to our buckets, it can be read immediately after. This is not always the case with Amazon S3 — a well-known issue for AWS developers.

Offer
Learn more about Linode Object Storage
Learn more about StackPath Object Storage
Sample Customers
Configr
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Pure Storage, Red Hat, SwiftStack and others in File and Object Storage. Updated: May 2020.
419,360 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all File and Object Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.