We performed a comparison between LiquidPlanner and Microsoft Project Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Project Portfolio Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Its dashboards and reports are the most valuable. We are able to share these reports and other information with our leadership."
"Microsoft Project Server helps organizations in collaboration."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is stable to use, especially since I work with Microsoft for an extended period."
"The solution is stable."
"Capacity management and task baselining are the most valuable features of Microsoft Project Server."
"The usability is excellent."
"The stability of the 2019 version is quite good."
"Technical support is very responsive - particularly on critical tickets."
"I like the way you can build the schedule by the Don't Start Before or Don't Start After values. You can use it to build your schedule based on how you change your dates. This is how it actually builds the schedule."
"It is a little rigorous in its methodology and is cumbersome. For example, I have a hard stop date and I would like a project to end by a specific date, but this is not how this solution works. It sorts of spits out the project date based on your resource availability, dependencies, and so on. This sort of project planning works in theory, but that's not always the case. It also relies heavily on resources entering their time into the system, that is, how much time they worked on each of the tasks so that it can sort of consistently update the project. I know that in a lot of organizations, including ours, it is almost impossible to get them to track the time. In terms of additional features, they can include more integration with Microsoft because integration is going to be a key functionality."
"The cost could be lower."
"It would be useful if the solution allowed us to share files or project schedules. You may get that with the cloud version. However, it's not available on the on-premises versions."
"EPM 2010 UI seems a bit dated now that 2016 is available."
"Microsoft is going to integrate the Co-Pilot features into Microsoft Project. The AI feature is an additional feature. It can look at the plan and identify risks early on from any part of your project."
"Permission management needs improvement."
"The price of the product must be improved."
"The product's UI is not very user-friendly."
"We want to expand to the local level where we lack strong IT expertise, we are considering making it more user-friendly."
Earn 20 points
LiquidPlanner is ranked 35th in Project Management Software while Microsoft Project Server is ranked 6th in Project Portfolio Management with 55 reviews. LiquidPlanner is rated 8.4, while Microsoft Project Server is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of LiquidPlanner writes "Good for reporting, but a little rigorous in its methodology and not conducive to real project management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Project Server writes "Provides holistic reporting and allows us to keep track of what's going on with projects". LiquidPlanner is most compared with , whereas Microsoft Project Server is most compared with Microsoft Project, ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management, Planisware, Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management and JIRA Portfolio. See our LiquidPlanner vs. Microsoft Project Server report.
See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors and best Project Management Software vendors.
We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
