We performed a comparison between Liquidware Stratusphere UX and Nexthink based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."There are a lot of customization options, such as creating your own tables and more. You have the option to make whatever you like and see whatever you want."
"Performance monitoring is a valuable feature."
"I like Stratusphere's login metrics. It lets you drill down to exactly what you want to see."
"Although limited to 100,000,000 events per engine, it is suffice to do investigations for more than 30 days."
"The solution is stable."
"Nexthink allows our customers to have visibility into their whole environment and security. And it lets you install the agent as a package for selected users instead of every user. This helps cut down on the delay involved in a bulk installation."
"Nexthink's best features are Engage and Act, which we use in combination for self-healing use cases."
"The auto building capability has been most valuable. It keeps on checking the system in terms of various factors like battery, memory usage and application usage."
"I would rate the solution's stability a nine out of ten."
"Number of service incidents dropped by more than 20%."
"Nexthink saves a lot of time for the technicians who work on the troubleshooting side...Nexthink provides its users with a very good point of overview and presentation."
"The time taken by the solution for the data to load should be improved. It was pretty high in some instances. The latency for some stuff to load up was pretty high."
"The dashboard is pretty lackluster compared to its competitors. They need to look at the competition and adopt some of those features. Liquidware could make the dashboarding more user-friendly and integrate scripting into the product."
"The main challenge for this solution is its lack of availability for training and in-depth troubleshooting steps."
"I would like it if they could put in some patch deployments and compliances."
"The tool should improve its pricing and performance. It also have nothing related to patch management."
"In our company, we can't deploy anything from Nexthink the way we can deploy from any other endpoint solutions. It is not possible to create any dashboard in Nexthink...One should be able to schedule monitoring in Nexthink."
"We need some guidance from the Nexthink team on some of the new features they are releasing and how best to use them."
"It would be good to have a more controlled way to access their cloud environment."
"They were having some limitations on the number of alerts that you can generate. This definitely needs to be increased."
"The solution could use better automation and less coding. Since I am part of the administrative background, I'm not completely into the development side. I'm not well versed in coding."
"The initial setup needs technical knowledge."
Liquidware Stratusphere UX is ranked 7th in Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) with 3 reviews while Nexthink is ranked 1st in Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) with 20 reviews. Liquidware Stratusphere UX is rated 7.6, while Nexthink is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Liquidware Stratusphere UX writes "Good performance monitoring, stable, and scalable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nexthink writes " A monitoring tool that helps save the time of its users with its features while offering a reasonable amount of stability and scalability". Liquidware Stratusphere UX is most compared with ControlUp and SysTrack, whereas Nexthink is most compared with SysTrack, ControlUp, Alluvio Aternity , ConnectWise Automate and Netskope Digital Experience Management. See our Liquidware Stratusphere UX vs. Nexthink report.
See our list of best Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) vendors.
We monitor all Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
