LiveAgent vs XWiki SAS comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
QualityUnit Logo
135 views|56 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
XWiki Logo
58 views|48 comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between LiveAgent and XWiki SAS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Zendesk, Freshworks and others in Knowledge Management Software.
To learn more, read our detailed Knowledge Management Software Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
Views
135
Comparisons
56
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
58
Comparisons
48
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Knowledge Management Software
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Zendesk, Freshworks and others in Knowledge Management Software. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

Stay on top of all customer requests and inquiries with LiveAgent, the most reviewed and top-rated help desk software for SMB in 2020. LiveAgent boasts the fastest chat widget on the market and has over 150M end-users worldwide. LiveAgent is a fully-featured web-based live chat and helpdesk software. LiveAgent harnesses the power of a universal inbox, real-time live chat, built-in call center, and a robust customer service portal. LiveAgent has over 179+ helpful features such as advanced automation features, rules, tags, and 40+ integrations.

Join companies like BMW, Yamaha, Huawei and Oxford University in providing world-class customer service. Start your free 14-day trial today, no credit card required.

XWiki is a powerful Open Source knowledge management platform that helps businesses save time and budget while enhancing collaboration on both team and organizational levels. It allows users across different departments to stay on the same page by accessing critical information in a fast and efficient way. Email overload, the loss of important knowledge when key employees leave are long forgotten and silos are reduced. With XWiki, vital information is only a click away, training and operations costs are reduced and data loss is prevented through regular backups. 

XWiki is developed thinking of extensibility, adaptability, and flexibility. It comes with over 750 apps and extensions and allows for endless customization. Moreover, App Within Minutes allows even non-technical users to create their own extensions to address specific needs with custom solutions and continue collaborating efficiently. Because every business is different, XWiki is available both on-premise and Cloud, and, since there is no vendor lock-in, switching between the two is possible at any time.

Sample Customers
Orange, Huawei, T Mobile, eOn, Solid Trust Pay, G4S, Oxford University
Amazon, Lenovo,  EMC, Cap Gemini, Crédit Mutuel Arkea, Brabantia, Électricité de France, Aelia, Energisa, Meetic, Chronopost. More references: http://www.xwiki.com/en/refere...
Buyer's Guide
Knowledge Management Software
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Zendesk, Freshworks and others in Knowledge Management Software. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

LiveAgent is ranked 11th in Knowledge Management Software while XWiki SAS is ranked 13th in Knowledge Management Software. LiveAgent is rated 8.0, while XWiki SAS is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of LiveAgent writes "Service level optimization is key as is the integrated email and chat functions". On the other hand, LiveAgent is most compared with , whereas XWiki SAS is most compared with Atlassian Confluence.

See our list of best Knowledge Management Software vendors.

We monitor all Knowledge Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.