We performed a comparison between LizardFS and Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about StarWind, Nutanix, Red Hat and others in Software Defined Storage (SDS).More Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
LizardFS is ranked 20th in Software Defined Storage (SDS) while Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct is ranked 8th in Software Defined Storage (SDS) with 7 reviews. LizardFS is rated 8.6, while Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of LizardFS writes "There is an automated built-in failover mechanism, but you must build it yourself if you have no support contract in place". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct writes "Stable solution with an easy initial setup process". LizardFS is most compared with Red Hat Ceph Storage and Red Hat Gluster Storage, whereas Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct is most compared with VMware vSAN, StarWind Virtual SAN, Red Hat Ceph Storage, Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) and DataCore SANsymphony.
See our list of best Software Defined Storage (SDS) vendors.
We monitor all Software Defined Storage (SDS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.