LizardFS vs Peaxy comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
LizardFS Logo
497 views|357 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
Peaxy Logo
90 views|79 comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between LizardFS and Peaxy based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about StarWind, Nutanix, Red Hat and others in Software Defined Storage (SDS).
To learn more, read our detailed Software Defined Storage (SDS) Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
Views
497
Comparisons
357
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
90
Comparisons
79
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Software Defined Storage (SDS)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about StarWind, Nutanix, Red Hat and others in Software Defined Storage (SDS). Updated: March 2024.
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Learn More
Peaxy
Video Not Available
Overview

Software Defined Storage LizardFS is a distributed, scalable, fault-tolerant and highly available file system. It allows users to combine disk space located on many servers into a single name space which is visible on Unix-like and Windows systems in the same way as other file systems. SDS LizardFS makes files secure by keeping all the data in many replicas spread over available servers. It can also be used to build space-efficient storage, because it is designed to run on commodity hardware. Disk and server failures are handled transparently without any downtime or loss of data. If storage requirements grow, it's possible to scale an existing SDS LizardFS installation just by adding new servers _ at any time, without any downtime. The system will automatically move some data to newly added servers, because it continuously takes care of balancing disk usage across all connected nodes. Removing servers is just as easy as adding a new one.

Peaxy provides a large-scale data infrastructure that consolidates data on and off premises into data lakes supported by the unified Peaxy namespace.
Sample Customers
Orange Polska, Platige Image, United State Department of Agriculture, Virtu Financial
Terranova
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider24%
University12%
Computer Software Company9%
Manufacturing Company7%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business30%
Midsize Enterprise16%
Large Enterprise54%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
Software Defined Storage (SDS)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about StarWind, Nutanix, Red Hat and others in Software Defined Storage (SDS). Updated: March 2024.
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

LizardFS is ranked 19th in Software Defined Storage (SDS) while Peaxy is ranked 30th in Software Defined Storage (SDS). LizardFS is rated 8.6, while Peaxy is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of LizardFS writes "There is an automated built-in failover mechanism, but you must build it yourself if you have no support contract in place". On the other hand, LizardFS is most compared with Red Hat Ceph Storage and Red Hat Gluster Storage, whereas Peaxy is most compared with .

See our list of best Software Defined Storage (SDS) vendors.

We monitor all Software Defined Storage (SDS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.