We performed a comparison between LizardFS and PernixData FVP [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about StarWind, Nutanix, Red Hat and others in Software Defined Storage (SDS).
LizardFS is ranked 19th in Software Defined Storage (SDS) while PernixData FVP [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Software Defined Storage (SDS). LizardFS is rated 8.6, while PernixData FVP [EOL] is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of LizardFS writes "There is an automated built-in failover mechanism, but you must build it yourself if you have no support contract in place". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PernixData FVP [EOL] writes "By adding storage intelligence at the server tier, it enables an architecture decoupling storage performance from capacity to utilize high speed server media in conjunction with any shared storage". LizardFS is most compared with Red Hat Ceph Storage and Red Hat Gluster Storage, whereas PernixData FVP [EOL] is most compared with .
See our list of best Software Defined Storage (SDS) vendors.
We monitor all Software Defined Storage (SDS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
