LizardFS vs PernixData FVP [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between LizardFS and PernixData FVP [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about StarWind, Nutanix, Red Hat and others in Software Defined Storage (SDS).
To learn more, read our detailed Software Defined Storage (SDS) Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
Views
508
Comparisons
368
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In Software Defined Storage (SDS)
Buyer's Guide
Software Defined Storage (SDS)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about StarWind, Nutanix, Red Hat and others in Software Defined Storage (SDS). Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Learn More
Nutanix
Video Not Available
Overview

Software Defined Storage LizardFS is a distributed, scalable, fault-tolerant and highly available file system. It allows users to combine disk space located on many servers into a single name space which is visible on Unix-like and Windows systems in the same way as other file systems. SDS LizardFS makes files secure by keeping all the data in many replicas spread over available servers. It can also be used to build space-efficient storage, because it is designed to run on commodity hardware. Disk and server failures are handled transparently without any downtime or loss of data. If storage requirements grow, it's possible to scale an existing SDS LizardFS installation just by adding new servers _ at any time, without any downtime. The system will automatically move some data to newly added servers, because it continuously takes care of balancing disk usage across all connected nodes. Removing servers is just as easy as adding a new one.

PernixData FVP software is a 100% software solution that clusters server flash and RAM to create a low latency I/O acceleration tier for any shared storage environment.
Sample Customers
Orange Polska, Platige Image, United State Department of Agriculture, Virtu Financial
GKL Marketing-Marktforschung, University Hospital Leipzig
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider25%
University11%
Computer Software Company8%
Manufacturing Company8%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business29%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise54%
REVIEWERS
Small Business86%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Buyer's Guide
Software Defined Storage (SDS)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about StarWind, Nutanix, Red Hat and others in Software Defined Storage (SDS). Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

LizardFS is ranked 20th in Software Defined Storage (SDS) while PernixData FVP [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Software Defined Storage (SDS). LizardFS is rated 8.6, while PernixData FVP [EOL] is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of LizardFS writes "There is an automated built-in failover mechanism, but you must build it yourself if you have no support contract in place". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PernixData FVP [EOL] writes "By adding storage intelligence at the server tier, it enables an architecture decoupling storage performance from capacity to utilize high speed server media in conjunction with any shared storage". LizardFS is most compared with Red Hat Ceph Storage and Red Hat Gluster Storage, whereas PernixData FVP [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Software Defined Storage (SDS) vendors.

We monitor all Software Defined Storage (SDS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.