Compare LizardFS vs. Red Hat Gluster Storage

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
LizardFS Logo
1,525 views|1,199 comparisons
Red Hat Gluster Storage Logo
4,923 views|3,671 comparisons
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Defined Storage (SDS) solutions are best for your needs.
510,204 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
1,525
Comparisons
1,199
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
4,923
Comparisons
3,671
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
242
Rating
7.0
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Red Hat Gluster, Red Hat Storage Server
Learn More
Overview

Software Defined Storage LizardFS is a distributed, scalable, fault-tolerant and highly available file system. It allows users to combine disk space located on many servers into a single name space which is visible on Unix-like and Windows systems in the same way as other file systems. SDS LizardFS makes files secure by keeping all the data in many replicas spread over available servers. It can also be used to build space-efficient storage, because it is designed to run on commodity hardware. Disk and server failures are handled transparently without any downtime or loss of data. If storage requirements grow, it's possible to scale an existing SDS LizardFS installation just by adding new servers _ at any time, without any downtime. The system will automatically move some data to newly added servers, because it continuously takes care of balancing disk usage across all connected nodes. Removing servers is just as easy as adding a new one.

Red Hat Gluster Storage (formerly known as Red Hat Storage Server) is a software-defined storage (SDS) platform designed to handle the requirements of traditional file storage—high-capacity tasks like backup and archival as well as high-performance tasks of analytics and virtualization. But unlike traditional storage systems, Red Hat Gluster Storage isn’t rigid and expensive. It easily scales across bare metal, virtual, container, and cloud deployments.

Offer
Learn more about LizardFS
Learn more about Red Hat Gluster Storage
Sample Customers
Orange Polska, Platige Image, United State Department of Agriculture, Virtu Financial
NTT Plala, McMaster University, University of Basque Country, Goodtech ASA, Cox Automotive, Raidió Teilifís Éireann (RTÉ), SaskTel, Glashart Media, Casio
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider41%
Financial Services Firm11%
Computer Software Company8%
Manufacturing Company5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company29%
Comms Service Provider29%
Government6%
Manufacturing Company4%
Find out what your peers are saying about Nutanix, StarWind, Zadara and others in Software Defined Storage (SDS). Updated: June 2021.
510,204 professionals have used our research since 2012.

LizardFS is ranked 19th in Software Defined Storage (SDS) while Red Hat Gluster Storage is ranked 17th in Software Defined Storage (SDS) with 1 review. LizardFS is rated 0.0, while Red Hat Gluster Storage is rated 7.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat Gluster Storage writes "Easy to upgrade but the interface should be simplified". LizardFS is most compared with Red Hat Ceph Storage, VMware vSAN, StarWind Virtual SAN and Portworx Enterprise, whereas Red Hat Gluster Storage is most compared with VMware vSAN, IBM Spectrum Scale, Red Hat Ceph Storage, Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct and NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP.

See our list of best Software Defined Storage (SDS) vendors.

We monitor all Software Defined Storage (SDS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.