We performed a comparison between k6 Open Source and Tricentis NeoLoad based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, OpenText, Tricentis and others in Load Testing Tools."The standout feature of k6 is its strong focus on API performance testing."
"There are several key features, including Jenkins integration, infrastructure monitoring, and results analysis."
"I would rate it as eight out of 10 for ease of setting up."
"The most useful aspect of Tricentis NeoLoad was for the web."
"I like the solution’s performance and integration. Also, the tool’s help center is very responsive and helpful. They have always helped me within a short duration of time."
"Simple capturing of dynamic variables and simple scripting."
"I feel that the codeless part, the dynamic value capture part is quite easy in NeoLoad compared to other tools."
"We appreciate that this solution is very user-friendly, even if the user does not have a lot of protocol knowledge and experience."
"It offered us an easy to use, limited code option for end-to-end performance testing."
"One area where k6 could improve is by introducing a GUI similar to JMeter."
"The solution’s pricing is higher compared to other tools. Though the product’s reports are accurate, it needs to be more detailed like other tools."
"Most people focus on HTTPS or TCP, but it would be good to have support for a variety of different protocols."
"We would like NeoLoad to be able to support more protocols. Testing can also be a little tricky at times."
"The solution can be improved by introducing a secure testing feature."
"An area for improvement in Tricentis NeoLoad is its price, as it has a hefty price tag."
"An area for improvement in Tricentis NeoLoad is its integration with third-party tools because, at the moment, it's a bit complicated. Per Tricentis, you can integrate Tricentis NeoLoad with different monitoring tools such as Dynatrace and New Relic, but that requires installing an additional tool to make that integration happen, rather than being able to pull in Tricentis NeoLoad from the different tools and servers, and make integration simpler and easier."
"The product must improve the features that allow integration with CI/CD pipelines."
"The protocol support area could be improved."
k6 Open Source is ranked 17th in Load Testing Tools with 1 review while Tricentis NeoLoad is ranked 3rd in Load Testing Tools with 57 reviews. k6 Open Source is rated 7.0, while Tricentis NeoLoad is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of k6 Open Source writes "Offers good scalability and has the ability to integrate with various systems and services". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis NeoLoad writes "Supports SAP and non-SAP applications and helps identify performance issues before production deployment". k6 Open Source is most compared with Apache JMeter, Akamai CloudTest and RadView WebLOAD, whereas Tricentis NeoLoad is most compared with Apache JMeter, OpenText LoadRunner Professional, OpenText LoadRunner Cloud, BlazeMeter and Eggplant Performance.
See our list of best Load Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.