Anonymous UserIT manager at a university
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"It helps us to route the traffic to the available servers. If we didn't have Loadbalancer we would fail to set the end-user and it would cause a failure in the cluster."
"For now, it's stable."
"The most valuable aspect is that it establishes user security."
"It is easy to expand. Our clients are enterprise-size."
"The most valuable feature is the load-balancing reverse proxy."
"The interface is easy, it's friendly, and has good alerting."
"There are many features you can set in the backend of Loadbalancer. They should simplify the configuration. The administrator should be able to configure it more simply. How it is now, you can only configure it if you have a lot of experience."
"It doesn't have the bonding capability feature."
"I would like for the load balancing to work with premier and the cloud, a mix of premium and cloud."
"Load balancing needs improvement. It needs better integration. I heard f5 works as a DNS operator which is not available in this solution. It would be better if that was implemented."
"We are having a difficult time with the security module, and how to implement the Radware security."
"Support is an area that needs improvement."
"For now, it's stable."
Loadbalancer.org leads the market in delivering high-performance load balancers and load balancing solutions to customers around the world. Customers who depend on the high-availability of business critical applications can take advantage of unparalleled versatility, affordable costs and instant access to the industry’s most responsive 24/7 support – even during a free trial. Founded in 2002, Loadbalancer.org has offices in the USA, Canada, Germany and headquarters in the UK. With thousands of physical, virtual & cloud-based appliances deployed across six continents, Loadbalancer.org ensures the uptime of e-commerce websites & mission critical applications globally, whilst also improving performance, security, scalability and providing a rapid return on investment (ROI). Loadbalancer.org offers a no-nonsense approach and complete focus on load balancing.
Loadbalancer.org is ranked 15th in Application Delivery Controllers with 2 reviews while Radware Alteon is ranked 9th in Application Delivery Controllers with 4 reviews. Loadbalancer.org is rated 7.6, while Radware Alteon is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Loadbalancer.org writes "Stable internet management and access but the scalability needs improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Radware Alteon writes "A good load-balancing reverse proxy for internal applications that is easy to setup and has good technical support". Loadbalancer.org is most compared with HAProxy, Citrix ADC, Kemp LoadMaster and F5 BIG-IP, whereas Radware Alteon is most compared with F5 BIG-IP, Citrix ADC, A10 Networks Thunder ADC, Radware LinkProof and Barracuda Web Application Firewall. See our Loadbalancer.org vs. Radware Alteon report.
See our list of best Application Delivery Controllers vendors.
We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.