Compare LoadRunner vs. Neotys NeoLoad

LoadRunner is ranked 1st in Performance Testing Tools with 7 reviews while Neotys NeoLoad is ranked 5th in Performance Testing Tools with 2 reviews. LoadRunner is rated 7.8, while Neotys NeoLoad is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of LoadRunner writes "Good synchronization capabilities but pilot processing needs improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Neotys NeoLoad writes "Best tool for testing in production without making many changes to the script or solution". LoadRunner is most compared with StormRunner Load, Apache JMeter and Neotys NeoLoad, whereas Neotys NeoLoad is most compared with LoadRunner, Apache JMeter and Performance Center. See our LoadRunner vs. Neotys NeoLoad report.
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
LoadRunner Logo
15,564 views|11,156 comparisons
Neotys NeoLoad Logo
8,611 views|4,124 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about LoadRunner vs. Neotys NeoLoad and other solutions. Updated: September 2019.
366,090 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

The Analysis feature makes it easy to analyze cross-data and we can pin to the focus period.Very useful for finding out how the system responds to load, stress, and normal situations, as well as benchmarking with other industry competitors. It also improved our response time, memory delegation, and CPU delegation. In addition, we used LoadRunner to optimize our database and website.It provides clients with an understanding of application and system performance.LoadRunner is a very systematic tool for anyone to use. Even someone who is actually a first time user of LoadRunner can actually get a lot of benefit out of the tool.Enables us to test most of the products and projects that we have across all the different technologies, without having to look at other tools.The number of protocols that it supports, and especially, for example, when it talks about SAP GUI-based performance testing.The ability to do multithreading. That's available in any performance testing tool, but the number of protocols that this particular tool supports has been very good.

Read more »

It helped in achieving the testing of on-premise applications, as well as cloud-based applications, without much difficulty.NeoLoad is best tool for testing in production without making many changes to the script or solution.It is a good source for load, stress and performance testing.

Read more »

The price of this solution should be cheaper.There is room for improvement of the pilot processing, the dump analysis, and forwarding results based on the dump analysis. We have a generator, root controller, different agents, and an analyzer, so all of these are very important when it comes to LoadRunner.Support for Microsoft Dynamics needs improvement.If they can make LoadRunner more comprehensive, it would really help.We still have some issues with integration with things like SiteScope which, obviously, being another HPE product should be very straightforward, but there are always issues around that.You should be able to use LoadRunner as a single platform. You should be able to have browser based access. You should be able to run enterprise tests.If the support of the protocols was the same throughout the other protocols and it was there evenly, then I would rate the product higher.

Read more »

NeoLoad does not support Citrix-based applications.It needs improvement with post-production.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
I don't know the licensing cost, but I think that you would get a discount for normal usage. I think there are different yearly options for different types of usage. It is not only how many users, but also whether it is shareable or not and other criteria involved in each feature. There are additional fees for the users and hardware linked to the processing.I would still consider LoadRunner as an expensive tool and you get a LoadRunner and the Performance Center.

Read more »

The licensing cost is less compared to other licensing performance testing tools.It is cheaper than other solutions.

Read more »

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
366,090 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Average Words per Review
Avg. Rating
Average Words per Review
Avg. Rating
Top Comparisons
Compared 24% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 33% of the time.
Compared 21% of the time.
Also Known As
Micro Focus LoadRunner, HPE LoadRunnerNeoLoad
Micro Focus
Video Not Available

LoadRunner is the Micro Focus industry-standard software solution for application performance and load testing. LoadRunner stresses your entire system to isolate and identify potential client, network, and server bottlenecks, supporting performance testing of new technologies together with your existing, legacy applications.

The NeoLoad load and performance testing tool for web and mobile apps realistically simulates user activity and monitors infrastructure behavior to eliminate bottlenecks. It covers all performance testing from component and automated tests to system-wide hybrid-cloud load tests.

Learn More about LoadRunner

Fill out the form to view the report

Learn more about Neotys NeoLoad
Sample Customers
JetBlue, GOME, Australian Red Cross Blood Service, RMIT University, Virgin MediaDell, H&R Block, Best Buy, Orange, Verizon Wireless, ING, Mazda, Siemens, University of Oxford
Top Industries
Comms Service Provider23%
Financial Services Firm23%
Consumer Goods8%
Software R&D Company29%
Insurance Company13%
Comms Service Provider12%
Financial Services Firm8%
Financial Services Firm8%
Software R&D Company17%
Financial Services Firm13%
Insurance Company13%
Healthcare Company8%
Find out what your peers are saying about LoadRunner vs. Neotys NeoLoad and other solutions. Updated: September 2019.
366,090 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email