We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare LoadUI Pro vs. Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Micro Focus, SmartBear and others in Performance Testing Tools. Updated: November 2021.
554,529 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"It stores good reports, as in, improved reports if compared with the SoapUI. It also has in-built security. You just need to switch and check the security testing. My team has never used it, but I know ReadyAPI provides those facilities as well."

More LoadUI Pro Pros »

"The TruClient feature is the most valuable for us. An application with testing can only be scripted using TruClient, so it's part web-based, but it also has its own protocol combined with HTTP and HTML. So many other tools do not recognize this specific proprietary protocol. Using TruClient, we can still create scripts that cover everything that we need to cover.""The most valuable feature is that we do not have to accommodate the load-testing infrastructure in our own data center.""The record and playback feature is the most valuable feature. It's all driven by the script, so it's a script-based tool where the background tracing starts. Java's background process does a lot of tracing. The process starts in the background. It sees what peaks of volumes that the process can handle. It's easy to use because it's script based, record, and playback. I""The most valuable feature is that you can create an infrastructure on-demand and do performance testing with it.""The fact that the solution supports multiple protocols such as open source, VuGen, TruWeb, TruClient, and SAP is very important because these protocols help us to concentrate on what is really needed to produce performance tests. If something is not supported, you have to use other tools or find other ways of assimilating loads.""The usability and ability to integrate with other solutions is quite good. When I use it in on Azure, then Red Hat is the most likely solution I use. When I use AWS, then I tend to use Lambda functions. In either case, it works well and you can use it either way."

More Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud Pros »

Cons
"This is an area for improvement with the tool. We unnecessarily use JMeter for some website testing, which we would like to avoid by introducing this tool for API and load testing because it provides load testing features."

More LoadUI Pro Cons »

"I don't know of any features that should be added. The solution isn't lacking anything at this point.""We are trying to put it into a complete CI/CD pipeline, but there are still some challenges when you try to run it through different protocols. The challenges are around how you can containerize applications. There are some limitations to some protocols, such as desktop. And when it comes to database testing, there are some things that we can't do through CI/CD.""I would like for there to be better integration with other tools so that when you do load testing you can also do a security check.""There are three modules in the system that are different products packaged into one, and they can sometimes be difficult to figure out, so they should be better integrated with each other.""Improvements to the reporting would be good.""Reporting and analysis need improvement. Compared to the old school LoadRunner Windows application, the reporting and analysis are mediocre in LoadRunner Cloud."

More Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"We make use of virtual user hours. We buy time in the LoadRunner Cloud. It costs around $80,000.""There is no monthly or yearly cost but rather, the fees are based on the amount of traffic that you use."

More Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
554,529 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: The TruClient feature is the most valuable for us. An application with testing can only be scripted using TruClient, so it's part web-based, but it also has its own protocol combined with HTTP and… more »
Top Answer: We make use of virtual user hours. We buy time in the LoadRunner Cloud. It costs around $80,000. I don't think there are any additional costs to standard licensing.
Top Answer: Reporting and analysis need improvement. Compared to the old school LoadRunner Windows application, the reporting and analysis are mediocre in LoadRunner Cloud.
Ranking
11th
Views
1,435
Comparisons
1,116
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
581
Rating
9.0
Views
5,003
Comparisons
3,380
Reviews
6
Average Words per Review
805
Rating
8.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
LoadUI NG Pro
StormRunner Load, LoadRunner Cloud, and Micro Focus StormRunner Load
Learn More
Overview

Speed is just as important as accuracy when it comes to APIs. A slow API can grind the user experience to a halt, but you don't have to wait for things to go live before understanding how they will behave under heavy load.

With LoadUI Pro, you can reuse your functional API tests built on the industry's #1 open-source based API testing tool, SoapUI Pro to speed testing and reduce the time it takes you to deploy high performance REST and SOAP web services.

Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud is a simple, smart and scalable cloud-based load and performance testing solution for agile and DevOps teams. It helps you to detect performance issues and ensure that your mobile and web apps are ready for the load. It provides an Intelligent and predictive analytics for fast problem detection and scale up to millions of user in minutes from different regions.

Offer
Learn more about LoadUI Pro
Learn more about Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud
Sample Customers
Mercedes-Benz, Adobe, Hilton Hotels, The Home Depot
Alfa Bank, N Brown Group, University of Copenhagen, McGraw-Hill, Cognizant
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company37%
Comms Service Provider22%
Insurance Company6%
Government6%
REVIEWERS
Educational Organization40%
Financial Services Firm20%
Retailer20%
Engineering Company10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company33%
Comms Service Provider13%
Financial Services Firm8%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business17%
Midsize Enterprise25%
Large Enterprise58%
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Micro Focus, SmartBear and others in Performance Testing Tools. Updated: November 2021.
554,529 professionals have used our research since 2012.

LoadUI Pro is ranked 11th in Performance Testing Tools with 1 review while Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud is ranked 4th in Performance Testing Tools with 6 reviews. LoadUI Pro is rated 9.0, while Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of LoadUI Pro writes "Facilitates load testing, operational volume testing, and spike testing for the APIs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud writes "Enabled us to eliminate load generators, and automatically triggers and produces reports". LoadUI Pro is most compared with Apache JMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional and Tricentis NeoLoad, whereas Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud is most compared with Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Apache JMeter, BlazeMeter and Tricentis NeoLoad.

See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors and best Load Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.