Compare LoadUI Pro vs. Neotys NeoLoad

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
LoadUI Pro Logo
1,738 views|1,522 comparisons
Neotys NeoLoad Logo
7,293 views|3,960 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use LoadUI Pro? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Apache, Neotys and others in Performance Testing Tools. Updated: December 2020.
454,950 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"It stores good reports, as in, improved reports if compared with the SoapUI. It also has in-built security. You just need to switch and check the security testing. My team has never used it, but I know ReadyAPI provides those facilities as well."

More LoadUI Pro Pros »

"It is a good source for load, stress and performance testing.""It helped in achieving the testing of on-premise applications, as well as cloud-based applications, without much difficulty.""NeoLoad is best tool for testing in production without making many changes to the script or solution.""I like the scripting and parameterization features.""The scripting is really user-friendly and the reporting is very good.""The test cases are quite easy to build and to maintain. This is the most valuable aspect of the solution for us. It's the reason why they changed from JMeter to NeoLoad.""The most valuable feature is flexibility, as it connects to all of the endpoints that we need it to.""Very easy to use the front end and the UI is very good."

More Neotys NeoLoad Pros »

Cons
"This is an area for improvement with the tool. We unnecessarily use JMeter for some website testing, which we would like to avoid by introducing this tool for API and load testing because it provides load testing features."

More LoadUI Pro Cons »

"It needs improvement with post-production.""NeoLoad does not support Citrix-based applications.""While importing the scripts from backup it should not create the new variables because it has created some issues for us.""I would like to see support for auto-correlations.""Sometimes it's complicated to maintain the test cases. It's much easier than in JMeter, however. I'm not sure if this depends so much on NeoLoad, or is more based on the environment that we are testing.""Most people focus on HTTPS or TCP, but it would be good to have support for a variety of different protocols.""Support wasn't able to solve a technical issue."

More Neotys NeoLoad Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"It is cheaper than other solutions.""The licensing cost is less compared to other licensing performance testing tools.""Licensing for NeoLoad is subscription-based."

More Neotys NeoLoad Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
454,950 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: The test cases are quite easy to build and to maintain. This is the most valuable aspect of the solution for us. It's the reason why they changed from JMeter to NeoLoad.
Top Answer: Overall, we're quite satisfied with the product. Sometimes it's complicated to maintain the test cases. It's much easier than in JMeter, however. I'm not sure if this depends so much on NeoLoad, or is… more »
Top Answer: We primarily use the solution for load testing. Our focus is not so much performance testing. We focus more on load testing, which does inadvertently include performance testing, however.
Ranking
11th
Views
1,738
Comparisons
1,522
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
581
Rating
9.0
Views
7,293
Comparisons
3,960
Reviews
6
Average Words per Review
287
Rating
8.7
Popular Comparisons
Compared 62% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 2% of the time.
Also Known As
LoadUI NG ProNeoLoad
Learn
SmartBear
Neotys
Video Not Available
Overview

Speed is just as important as accuracy when it comes to APIs. A slow API can grind the user experience to a halt, but you don't have to wait for things to go live before understanding how they will behave under heavy load.

With LoadUI Pro, you can reuse your functional API tests built on the industry's #1 open-source based API testing tool, SoapUI Pro to speed testing and reduce the time it takes you to deploy high performance REST and SOAP web services.

The NeoLoad load and performance testing tool for web and mobile apps realistically simulates user activity and monitors infrastructure behavior to eliminate bottlenecks. It covers all performance testing from component and automated tests to system-wide hybrid-cloud load tests.

Offer
Learn more about LoadUI Pro
Learn more about Neotys NeoLoad
Sample Customers
Mercedes-Benz, Adobe, Hilton Hotels, The Home DepotDell, H&R Block, Best Buy, Orange, Verizon Wireless, ING, Mazda, Siemens, University of Oxford
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company47%
Comms Service Provider15%
Government6%
Insurance Company5%
REVIEWERS
Retailer19%
Government19%
Individual & Family Service13%
Computer Software Company13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company42%
Comms Service Provider11%
Insurance Company7%
Energy/Utilities Company5%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business6%
Midsize Enterprise20%
Large Enterprise74%
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Apache, Neotys and others in Performance Testing Tools. Updated: December 2020.
454,950 professionals have used our research since 2012.

LoadUI Pro is ranked 11th in Performance Testing Tools with 1 review while Neotys NeoLoad is ranked 4th in Performance Testing Tools with 7 reviews. LoadUI Pro is rated 9.0, while Neotys NeoLoad is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of LoadUI Pro writes "Facilitates load testing, operational volume testing, and spike testing for the APIs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Neotys NeoLoad writes "Easy to build test cases, good stability and good scalability". LoadUI Pro is most compared with Apache JMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, BlazeMeter and SmartBear LoadComplete, whereas Neotys NeoLoad is most compared with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Apache JMeter, BlazeMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise and Akamai CloudTest.

See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors and best Load Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.