We performed a comparison between LocalDB and SAP HANA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Relational Databases Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of LocalDBis the connection between the application and DB."
"The initial setup is very straightforward. The guidelines are very easy to follow. Maintenance is very easy and requires very little manpower."
"The initial setup was simple."
"The solution is fast."
"It's easy to use, and the Hana Studio is pretty good."
"In comparison with other DMS solutions, it offers good performance."
"We like that the product is both vertically and horizontally scalable, allowing us to do around 86 percent compression of documentation from 50 to seven terabytes."
"The most valuable features I have found are speed, dashboard, and reporting."
"The feature that I like the most is that we can transport the data to our web data application. SAP HANA's performance is really perfect. We're working on big data, and SAP HANA is really working on high performance. We are happy working with it."
"We have found that the Fiori Apps are particularly good."
"The initial setup is straightforward. It usually takes around eight months but it depends on a customer's requirements. We can spend a month or two customizing."
"Provides us with predictive capabilities for asset maintenance, and real-time forecasts."
"The solution needs to create a management tool. Right now, the solution has tools for creating a local installation, but it's too simplistic. We need something that's a bit more complex so that we can extend the tools with our scripts."
"The internal connection features of LocalDB could improve."
"The ALM features can be improved, but the database by itself is reliable."
"The initial setup is complex and requires a skilled person."
"The openness of the system could be more developed. The solution should go into the cloud. The cloud mechanism should be more invested."
"When you do a report on a non-SAP platform, you face some compatibility problems."
"It would be nice to know when SAP plans to stop its maintenance of a previous version of SAP ECC ERP because, at this point, anyone utilizing SAP will have no choice but to go on S/4HANA Database."
"The bid process needs to be improved."
"The documentation can be improved in the future."
"The inclusion of a well-performing Time Machine is vital."
"More standards would help in the future."
"The user interface and CRM need to be more user-friendly."
LocalDB is ranked 15th in Relational Databases Tools with 5 reviews while SAP HANA is ranked 3rd in Relational Databases Tools with 79 reviews. LocalDB is rated 9.0, while SAP HANA is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of LocalDB writes "Good for the development process, generally stable, and easy to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP HANA writes "Excellent compatibility between modules and the control". LocalDB is most compared with SQL Server, MySQL, Oracle Database In-Memory, Oracle Database and Infobright DB, whereas SAP HANA is most compared with Oracle Database, SQL Server, MySQL, IBM Db2 Database and Apache Spark. See our LocalDB vs. SAP HANA report.
See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.
We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.