Compare LogDNA vs. ManageEngine Log360

LogDNA is ranked 12th in Log Management with 1 review while ManageEngine Log360 is ranked 15th in Log Management with 3 reviews. LogDNA is rated 10.0, while ManageEngine Log360 is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of LogDNA writes "Has vastly increased our ability to reach SLA targets consistently". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ManageEngine Log360 writes "Deployment is quite simple and straightforward and it has a good graphics interface ". LogDNA is most compared with ELK Logstash, IBM QRadar and Google Stackdriver, whereas ManageEngine Log360 is most compared with Splunk, ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer and SolarWinds LEM.
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
LogDNA Logo
390 views|349 comparisons
ManageEngine Log360 Logo
3,037 views|2,432 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use ManageEngine Log360? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, LogRhythm, IBM and others in Log Management. Updated: March 2020.
407,242 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

The solution aggregates all event streams, so that if there are any issues, it's all in the same interface.

Read more »

The most valuable feature is that this solution is more secure than others, and there are more applications and features as well.You can have all of the logs from servers to network and it gets sent out to the correct owners. This is very helpful.The deployment is quite simple and pretty straightforward.

Read more »

No ability to encapsulate a query or a filter, and communicate or share that among the team.

Read more »

We can log in as a local user, and it's fine, but when we login with an Active Directory user, we cannot.The graphical interface could be made easier to use when you are connecting to different network equipment.Most times log sheets are not assigned well.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
There is a cost for each feature used.

Read more »

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.
407,242 professionals have used our research since 2012.
out of 48 in Log Management
Average Words per Review
Avg. Rating
out of 48 in Log Management
Average Words per Review
Avg. Rating
Top Comparisons
Compared 34% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 27% of the time.

LogDNA is a powerful, multi-cloud log management system that aggregates all system, server, and application logs into one modernized platform. Centralize, monitor, store, tail, and analyze logs in real-time with one simple command-line or web interface. Setup takes just 1-2 minutes. Deploy as a cloud SaaS solution, on-premises using your own infrastructure, or as a hybrid solution. Empower your engineers with the exact logging solutions they need so they can focus on what they do best - create quality products.

Log360 is your one-stop solution for all log management and network security challenges. It is an integrated solution that combines EventLog Analyzer and ADAudit Plus into a single console to help you manage your Active Directory auditing and network security easily.

Learn more about LogDNA
Learn more about ManageEngine Log360
Sample Customers
Instacart, Asics, Lime, SalesforceFirst Mountain Bank, TRA, Citadel Group, OnPoint Financial Corp, Florida Dept. of Transportation
Top Industries
No Data Available
Software R&D Company35%
Comms Service Provider12%
Manufacturing Company12%
K 12 Educational Company Or School8%
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, LogRhythm, IBM and others in Log Management. Updated: March 2020.
407,242 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.