LogiNext vs ServiceScheduling comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
LogiNext Logo
158 views|86 comparisons
ServicePower Logo
45 views|33 comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between LogiNext and ServiceScheduling based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, IFS, Freshworks and others in Field Service Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Field Service Management Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
8th
Views
158
Comparisons
86
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
23rd
Views
45
Comparisons
33
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Field Service Management
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, IFS, Freshworks and others in Field Service Management. Updated: March 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
LogiNext Mile, LogiNext Haul, LogiNext On Demand, LogiNext Reverse, LogiNext Force
Learn More
ServicePower
Video Not Available
Overview

We employ smart technology and analytics in supply chain using Internet of Things (IoT) to serve every client need. LogiNext’s Mile, LogiNext Haul, LogiNext On-Demand, LogiNext Field and LogiNext Reverse logistics optimization tools are highly automated and configurable enterprise logistics software solutions which will enable streamlined operations and lower costs. All the products are enabled with real-time Live logistics Tracking, routing and scheduling features.

ServicePower's ServiceScheduling offers real-time schedule optimization technology and provides real time, unlimited, industry acknowledged route optimization using the latest algorithms. ServiceScheduling provides the wide range of features: Plan and forecast coverage using the latest map layering technology, Model configuration in non-production environment, Use a modern, hosted Management Console to oversee operations, Manage workforce skills-geography-shifts, Offer optimize appointments, schedule jobs with floating SLAs or lat/long coordinates, Access Optimization on Demand if full intra-day optimization is not desired, Fully mobilize field resources with ServiceMobility, Monitor scheduled jobs and handle exceptions through a real time Gantt interface, Track company assets and compare mobile status with ServiceGPS, Integrated IoT/M2M facilitates quick, automated response to outages and repairs, and more importantly, supports the transition to a proactive, maintenance scheduling model and Gather and analyze data, driving workforce efficiencies, and adjust operations to meet KPIs and customer satisfaction metrics through self-learning, in-memory ServiceStats
Sample Customers
Paytm, Prasanna Cargo,Washola, Furture Retail, Shalimar Paints, Agility, Mahindra Logistics, Concor, Quifers, hello grocery, TATA Chemicals, JK Lakshmi Cement,Kurl on, G-Trans Logistics, APL, DHL, Godrej Consumer Products, Hindustan Unilever,Kelvin Cold chain, UGC, Yusen Logistics,Flyking, Myntra, Maruti Suzuki, Grocer max, Asian Paints, Mahindra Logistics
Mitsubishi Electric, ADT Security Services, Northern Ireland Electricity, ESI Enterprises, Richer Sounds, BrandsMart
Buyer's Guide
Field Service Management
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, IFS, Freshworks and others in Field Service Management. Updated: March 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

LogiNext is ranked 8th in Field Service Management while ServiceScheduling is ranked 23rd in Field Service Management. LogiNext is rated 0.0, while ServiceScheduling is rated 0.0. On the other hand, LogiNext is most compared with Locus Dispatcher, whereas ServiceScheduling is most compared with .

See our list of best Field Service Management vendors.

We monitor all Field Service Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.