Compare LogRhythm Enterprise UEBA vs. Microsoft ATA [EOL]
![Microsoft ATA [EOL] Logo](https://itcentralstation-res.cloudinary.com/image/upload/c_scale,f_auto,q_auto,w_80/GqfBeX9zWxZG3rC5hyrUo9Aq.jpeg)
 | Nuwan Chathuranga Team Lead - Network and Security at Connex Information Technologies |
Find out what your peers are saying about Securonix Solutions, Splunk, One Identity and others in User Behavior Analytics - UEBA. Updated: February 2021.
464,655 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The solution's most valuable features are the graphical user interface and the reporting."
"It has a lot of features. It has file integration monitoring."
"The most valuable features are file activity monitoring and registry activity monitoring."
"One of the most valuable features is the ability to report on questionable activity."
"The solution works well when used with other Microsoft solutions."
"The stability of the solution is very good."
Cons
"The search feature needs to be improved."
"It should have better mitigation with other solutions and be tightly integrated with other solutions. It has to be improved."
"It would be helpful if there were more guidance provided for integrating with unsupported devices."
"Some of the newer features are not completely there yet... For example, there's a tool that allows you to grade your overall internal security and I don't feel that it's completely accurate."
"It would be ideal if the interface allowed for more granular configurations. For example, if I were to set a rule that is a deviation from the pre-defined rules in the Microsoft product, there's conflict."
"There are occasions where it generates some false positives and you have to embark into figuring it out. You need to find out if it was a true alert or a false positive. It's a little bit cumbersome in that area."
"Licensing is on a yearly basis. It's not expensive compared to its competitors."
"The pricing is nice when compared to other products in the industry."
"I believe we are looking into new licenses. They may be called the E5. Honestly, I don't have it on top of my mind, but I think it's around seven to $10 a user per month."
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which User Behavior Analytics - UEBA solutions are best for your needs.
464,655 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Top Answer: The most valuable features are file activity monitoring and registry activity monitoring.
Top Answer: The pricing is nice when compared to other products in the industry.
Top Answer: It would be helpful if there were more guidance provided for integrating with unsupported devices.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Views
1,685
Comparisons
1,399
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
288
Rating
6.0
Unranked
In User Behavior Analytics - UEBA
Compared 31% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 27% of the time.
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 2% of the time.
LogRhythm CloudAI, LogRhythm UEBA
Microsoft Advanced Threat Analytics
LogRhythm UEBA enables your security team to quickly and effectively detect, respond to, and neutralize both known and unknown threats. Providing evidence-based starting points for investigation, it employs a combination of scenario analytics techniques (e.g., statistical analysis, rate analysis, trend analysis, advanced correlation), and both supervised and unsupervised machine learning (ML).
Microsoft Advanced Threat Analytics (ATA) provides a simple and fast way to understand what is happening within your network by identifying suspicious user and device activity with built-in intelligence and providing clear and relevant threat information on a simple attack timeline. Microsoft ATA is an on-premises platform to help you protect your enterprise from advanced targeted attacks by automatically analyzing, learning, and identifying normal and abnormal entity (user, devices, and resources) behavior. It detects suspicious activities and malicious attacks with behavioral analytics, adapts to the changing nature of cyber-security threats, focuses on what is important with a simple attack timeline and reduces false positive fatigue.
Learn more about LogRhythm Enterprise UEBA
Learn more about Microsoft ATA [EOL]
Turkish Airlines, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Empa, The Alberta Teachers' Association
Computer Software Company29%
Comms Service Provider26%
Financial Services Firm10%
Media Company6%
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider17%
Government11%
Financial Services Firm7%
Find out what your peers are saying about Securonix Solutions, Splunk, One Identity and others in User Behavior Analytics - UEBA. Updated: February 2021.
464,655 professionals have used our research since 2012.
LogRhythm Enterprise UEBA is ranked 15th in User Behavior Analytics - UEBA with 3 reviews while Microsoft ATA [EOL] is ranked unranked in User Behavior Analytics - UEBA with 3 reviews. LogRhythm Enterprise UEBA is rated 6.0, while Microsoft ATA [EOL] is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of LogRhythm Enterprise UEBA writes "Good file and registry activity monitoring capability, and the support team is helpful". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft ATA [EOL] writes "Good integration, simple to maintain, and very stable". LogRhythm Enterprise UEBA is most compared with Darktrace, Cisco Stealthwatch, Splunk User Behavior Analytics, Vectra AI and Trend Micro Deep Discovery Inspector, whereas Microsoft ATA [EOL] is most compared with Splunk User Behavior Analytics, Varonis Datalert, Securonix UEBA, Exabeam and ArcSight Analytics.
See our list of best User Behavior Analytics - UEBA vendors.
We monitor all User Behavior Analytics - UEBA reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.