LookingGlass Manage Intelligence vs Threat Hunting Framework comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between LookingGlass Manage Intelligence and Threat Hunting Framework based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Recorded Future, Check Point Software Technologies, Microsoft and others in Threat Intelligence Platforms.
To learn more, read our detailed Threat Intelligence Platforms Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
Views
80
Comparisons
64
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
394
Comparisons
247
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Threat Intelligence Platforms
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Recorded Future, Check Point Software Technologies, Microsoft and others in Threat Intelligence Platforms. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
ScoutVision, ScoutPrime, LookingGlass Cyber Threat Center, LookingGlass CTC, LookingGlass Cyber Solutions
Learn More
LookingGlass
Video Not Available
Overview

LookingGlass Managed Threat Intelligence combines broad structured threat data feeds and incidents of compromise (IOCs) with multi-source collection across the surface, social, Deep and Dark Web. Our managed service utilizes advanced content scoring and round-the-clock human vetting to deliver timely, relevant, and actionable intelligence across the entire spectrum of risks indicated online.

Group-IB is a Singapore-based provider of solutions aimed at the detection and prevention of cyberattacks and online fraud. The company also specializes in high-profile cyber investigations and IP protection services. Group-IB’s Threat Intelligence & Attribution system has been named one of the best in class by Gartner, Forrester, and IDC, while its Threat Hunting Framework has been recognized as one of the leaders in Network Detection and Response.
Group-IB’s technological leadership is built on the company’s 18 years of hands-on experience in cybercrime investigations around the world and 65 000 hours of cybersecurity incident response accumulated in one of the biggest forensic laboratory and a round-the-clock center providing a rapid response to cyber incidents — CERT-GIB.
Group-IB is a partner of INTERPOL, Europol, and has been recommended by the OSCE as a cybersecurity solutions provider.

Sample Customers
PROTEGE PARTNERS L L C, Peridot Solutions
Information Not Available
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company19%
Financial Services Firm13%
Government12%
Manufacturing Company10%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business9%
Midsize Enterprise20%
Large Enterprise71%
Buyer's Guide
Threat Intelligence Platforms
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Recorded Future, Check Point Software Technologies, Microsoft and others in Threat Intelligence Platforms. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

LookingGlass Manage Intelligence is ranked 45th in Threat Intelligence Platforms while Threat Hunting Framework is ranked 25th in Threat Intelligence Platforms. LookingGlass Manage Intelligence is rated 0.0, while Threat Hunting Framework is rated 9.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Threat Hunting Framework writes "High fidelity cyber incident detection is near in real-time, enabling proactive & timely mitigation efforts". LookingGlass Manage Intelligence is most compared with , whereas Threat Hunting Framework is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, DomainTools Iris and Cognyte Threat Intelligence Analytics.

See our list of best Threat Intelligence Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.