Compare LSI ONStor Clustered NAS Gateways vs. Nasuni

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Top Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, IBM, Dell EMC and others in NAS. Updated: September 2021.
536,548 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"It is around $850 per terabyte per year. Any additional costs that you would incur are for the local caching devices that you'll need to access Nasuni. You kind of provide your own virtual machines or compute to access the data. You also pay for the object storage. So, there are three parts to it. There is the Nasuni license per terabyte. You would also pay for the actual object storage in the cloud, and then you would pay for virtual machines to access the storage.""The pricing is on par with everybody else, and fair.""The cost is based on the capacity, which is approximately $100 USD per terabyte.""It has a license fee as well as hardware costs, which we would incur if we want to use Nasuni Cloud Storage Gateway for upgrades.""I would not say it is economically priced, but it is affordable. If you can afford to pay for it, it is worth the money, but it is definitely not overpriced. It is priced about where it needs to be in the market. We were satisfied with the way they did their licensing and how they handled it. I believe they actually license by data size. It is based on how much data is being held on the machine and replicated, and that's completely understandable. So, for us, their pricing was as expected and affordable.""Our agreement is set up such that we pay annually per terabyte, and we buy a chunk of it at a time. Then if we run out of space, we go back to them and buy another chunk."

More Nasuni Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NAS solutions are best for your needs.
536,548 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: The global file locking feature is valuable. The ability to quickly deploy new sites is also valuable.
Top Answer: It is around $850 per terabyte per year. Any additional costs that you would incur are for the local caching devices that you'll need to access Nasuni. You kind of provide your own virtual machines or… more »
Top Answer: Room for improvement would be the speed of replication of new files. I would also like to see cloud mirroring.
Ranking
25th
out of 27 in NAS
Views
39
Comparisons
26
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
8th
out of 27 in NAS
Views
2,686
Comparisons
2,191
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
563
Rating
8.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
ONStor Clustered NAS Gateways
Learn More
LSI
Video Not Available
Overview

ONStor 3000 Series NAS gateway lets you consolidate your unstructured data under a single file management framework over SAN storage of your choice. ONStor 3000 is interoperable with a broad range of enterprise SAN storage arrays from multiple vendors delivering investment protection of your existing storage assets.

Nasuni combines storage, backup and disaster recovery into a single solution. No additional backup software is necessary. With multiple copies of every snapshot stored in the cloud across multiple geographies, in locations of the company’s choosing, the enterprise is fully protected in case of a disaster. A full restore is as simple as starting up a virtual machine.

Offer
Learn more about LSI ONStor Clustered NAS Gateways
Learn more about Nasuni
Sample Customers
University of California Santa Barbara, Mott Community College
Environmental Systems Design Inc., Imagination, Lewis Group of Companies, Saint Michaels College, TBG Partners, Sedgwick LLP, Barry Isett & Associates, Perkins+Will
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Construction Company47%
Marketing Services Firm20%
Engineering Company7%
Financial Services Firm7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company26%
Comms Service Provider12%
Media Company9%
Manufacturing Company8%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise44%
Large Enterprise44%
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, IBM, Dell EMC and others in NAS. Updated: September 2021.
536,548 professionals have used our research since 2012.

LSI ONStor Clustered NAS Gateways is ranked 25th in NAS while Nasuni is ranked 8th in NAS with 12 reviews. LSI ONStor Clustered NAS Gateways is rated 0.0, while Nasuni is rated 9.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nasuni writes "Secure, reliable, good performance, helpful alerting, and responsive support". LSI ONStor Clustered NAS Gateways is most compared with , whereas Nasuni is most compared with Panzura, AWS Storage Gateway, Qumulo, Cohesity SpanFS and CTERA Cloud Backup.

See our list of best NAS vendors.

We monitor all NAS reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.