We performed a comparison between M-Files and OpenText Documentum based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Box, DocuWare, Hyland and others in Document Management Software."Using M-Files means anybody on the executive team to go in and immediately look at a dashboard and know the status of a contract."
"It stands out for its impressive records management capabilities and the ability to handle an extensive volume of documents, even reaching into the billions."
"The most valuable feature is that it's a central repository for everything, whether it's videos, documents, Excel sheets, etc."
"It provides possibilities for us to save documents and supporting the business process while doing so."
"The stability is very good."
"The most valuable feature of OpenText Documentum is the versioning."
"The product is tamper-proof and enables us to return to the document source, which is helpful in legal issues."
"It is quite good."
"The most valuable features of this solution are the security, storage, and document search capability."
"The integration with other products needs to be improved."
"OpenText Documentum's user interface could be improved a little bit."
"The user interface can be a bit more intuitive."
"It needs a better UI and it should also be cloud-ready. The UI has not changed in years."
"The main issue is the software's performance when storing around 10 million or more documents. It becomes slow and needs improvement. Perhaps it's a cloud-related issue, but it needs to be addressed. It could be due to our S3 bucket or something else. Nevertheless, this is a significant challenge we're facing."
"An area that needs to improve is how to reduce storage space on the AWS site."
"OpenText Documentum has a lot of scope for improvement in terms of adding some AI integrations."
"They should develop something so that bugs don't happen in our project. We make changes manually and some bugs happen."
"The product needs to improve the way documents are logged together. I believe running it on the cloud or containerization will bring value to it. The tool's Time to Market and deployment cycle need to be improved. Finding suitable training materials for OpenText Documentum is also a bottleneck. If we can find the training modules easily, we can bring together people, give them quick training, and start working on the deployment. It can help with quick outputs."
Earn 20 points
M-Files is ranked 8th in Document Management Software while OpenText Documentum is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Content Management with 25 reviews. M-Files is rated 9.0, while OpenText Documentum is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of M-Files writes "Good workflows, and it is easy to use with a dashboard that improves contract visibility". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Documentum writes "Saves time and increases an organization's productivity". M-Files is most compared with SharePoint, OpenText Extended ECM, IBM FileNet, Microsoft OneDrive and Alfresco, whereas OpenText Documentum is most compared with OpenText Extended ECM, SharePoint, IBM FileNet, Hyland OnBase and OpenText eDOCS.
We monitor all Document Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.