Compare M-Files vs. Systemware ECM
Most Helpful Review | |
Use Systemware ECM? Share your opinion. | |
 Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, IBM, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: January 2021. 457,209 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice | |
"They have an Optical Character Scanning module but we didn't buy it because it's ridiculously expensive." | Information Not Available |
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs. 457,209 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Ranking  | |
Views 1,610 Comparisons 1,311 Reviews 1 Average Words per Review 786 Rating 8.0 | Views 179 Comparisons 122 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A |
Popular Comparisons | |
 Compared 33% of the time.  Compared 16% of the time. Compared 11% of the time.  Compared 9% of the time. Compared 6% of the time. |  Compared 100% of the time. |
Learn | |
| M-Files | Systemware |
Overview | |
M-Files provides a next generation intelligent information management platform that improves business performance by helping people find and use information more effectively. Unlike traditional enterprise content management (ECM) systems or content services platforms, M-Files unifies systems, data and content across the organization without disturbing existing systems and processes or requiring data migration. M-Files breaks down silos by delivering an in-context experience for accessing and leveraging information that resides in any system and repository, including network folders, SharePoint, file sharing services, ECM systems, CRM, ERP and other business systems and repositories. Thousands of organizations in over 100 countries use M-Files for managing their business information and processes, including NBC Universal, Rovio and SAS. M-Files website | Systemware has a product suite with a set of ECMÂ components, including image and capture, records management, workfrom, archiving and output management. Systemware Content Cloud ECM provides a delivery option for customers to deploy their content management applications in an on-premises cloud. |
Offer | |
Learn more about M-Files | Learn more about Systemware ECM |
Sample Customers | |
| Comcast, Rovio, OMV, Sagem, UNEP, Elekta, Caverion, SAS, HCP, Yokohama | Bank of America, 7-Eleven, American Bank of Texas, DTCC, MedSynergies |
Top Industries | |
Computer Software Company34% Comms Service Provider21% Construction Company8% Media Company5% | No Data Available |
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, IBM, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: January 2021.
457,209 professionals have used our research since 2012.
M-Files is ranked 7th in Enterprise Content Management with 1 review while Systemware ECM is ranked 25th in Enterprise Content Management. M-Files is rated 8.0, while Systemware ECM is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of M-Files writes "Good workflows, and it is easy to use with a dashboard that improves contract visibility". On the other hand, M-Files is most compared with SharePoint, OpenText Content Suite Platform, OpenText Documentum, Hyland OnBase and Microsoft OneDrive, whereas Systemware ECM is most compared with ASG Mobius.
See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.