Mackerel vs Ruxit [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Mackerel Logo
161 views|137 comparisons
Dynatrace Logo
views| comparisons
83% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Mackerel and Ruxit [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Mackerel?
Mark Kaplan
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer:Hi Avi! It's great to see your thorough approach to selecting an APM package for your MSP company. Considering your focus on SMBs and enterprises in Israel, Dynatrace seems like a solid choice with… more »
Ranking
Views
161
Comparisons
137
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Learn More
Mackerel
Video Not Available
Dynatrace
Video Not Available
Overview
Mackerel is an elegantly simple and powerful service that employs the concept of "roles" to optimize management and monitoring of hosts. By running mackerel-agent on your hosts, you can manage any number of hosts using both Mackerel's web GUI and API to visualize the statuses of your hosts and applications with a high degree of detail and customization.

ruxit provides all-in-one monitoring and operations management for DevOps teams working in startups, mid-sized companies, and large organizations. Using proprietary artificial intelligence technology, ruxit enables companies to manage thousands of servers using a simple interface.

ruxit includes monitoring features that cover your entire application stack:
• Real user monitoring (browser-based performance monitoring)
• Application performance monitoring for Java, Node.js, and .NET (PHP and Ruby coming soon)
• Server and process monitoring for Windows and Linux
• Network monitoring
• EC2 virtual infrastructure monitoring

Sample Customers
M.T.Burn Inc., Nulab Inc., Nintendo, Livesense, Seesaa, Retty, Gyazo, Hatena, GMO, Kaizen Platform, Prott
Sofico, lemniscus.de, CHIP Digital, BARBRI INC, Bluesoft, uninett.no, Usersnap
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Mackerel is ranked 75th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability while Ruxit [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Mackerel is rated 0.0, while Ruxit [EOL] is rated 9.2. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ruxit [EOL] writes "Best overall monitoring system out there". Mackerel is most compared with , whereas Ruxit [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.