Compare Magic xpa Application Platform vs. Oracle WebLogic Server

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The speed of development is the quickest for any tool on the market."

More Magic xpa Application Platform Pros »

"The product is flexible and allows us to leverage deployments.""It has good integration with security features, including OWASP.""It is quite robust in comparison to other application servers."

More Oracle WebLogic Server Pros »

Cons
"The user interface could be improved to be more friendly for developers."

More Magic xpa Application Platform Cons »

"The quarterly updates can sometimes lead to instability depending on the configuration of systems.""In the future, I would like to see better support for the REST interface.""Its pricing should be better. We are analyzing other options, such as JBoss, because of the cost of WebLogic."

More Oracle WebLogic Server Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The cost for developers is high because you have to pay for licenses as well as runtime."

More Magic xpa Application Platform Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The licensing fees are annual and depend on the model.""In our country, this is an expensive product.""It is expensive."

More Oracle WebLogic Server Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Server solutions are best for your needs.
511,773 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: It has good integration with security features, including OWASP.
Top Answer: We have had some problems with cluster solutions when working with a WebLogic domain. It may be because the error codes and error information is poor. In the future, I would like to see better support… more »
Top Answer: We are a software solution provider and I am a Java software developer. When I deploy my work, I use an application server like Oracle WebLogic. We have not deployed this product for our own use, but… more »
Ranking
7th
out of 21 in Application Server
Views
1,852
Comparisons
851
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
599
Rating
8.0
3rd
out of 21 in Application Server
Views
5,903
Comparisons
5,173
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
473
Rating
7.3
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
uniPaaS
WebLogic Application Server
Learn More
Overview
Magic&nbspxpa Application Platform is a code-free, visual development and deployment environment for the quick creation of enterprise-grade mobile, web and desktop apps. Magic&nbspxpa lets you leverage the same business logic to develop once and deploy across platforms. You can create a portfolio of high performance business apps with a single skill set and minimal resources. By allowing you to develop, maintain and update apps quickly and cost-effectively, Magic supports your digital transformation and enterprise mobility strategies, making it easy for you to give your business a competitive edge.

Oracle WebLogic Server 12c, the world’s first cloud-native, enterprise Java platform enables you to fully realize the benefits of cloud computing. Unique multitenancy capability drives massive consolidation. Lightweight microcontainer architecture drives application isolation and 100 percent portability between your private and public cloud. Multi data center high availability architecture protects against application disruption. Developer innovations with full Java EE 7 and Java SE8 support maximize DevOps productivity. Additionally, you continue to have access to the same platform on premises and in the cloud, via Oracle Java Cloud Service, which is based on Oracle WebLogic Server.

For more information on Oracle Weblogic Server, visit Oracle.com

Offer
Learn more about Magic xpa Application Platform
Learn more about Oracle WebLogic Server
Sample Customers
ADD, Cape plc, Adecco, Kuno Kinzoku Industry Co., GE Capital, Dove Tree, CBS Outdoor, Paris-Nord Villepinte Exhibition Center, Allstate Life Insurance Company, Titan Software Systems
Colab Consulting Pty. Ltd., Infosys Ltd., Sascar, Banca Transilvania, UL, Center for Railway Information Systems, SPAR Austria Group, Reliance Commercial Finance, Industrial Bank of Korea, Al Jaber Group, Safe Water Kenya, Chhattisgarh Infotech and Biotech Promotion Society
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider42%
Computer Software Company13%
Insurance Company11%
Financial Services Firm5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company41%
Comms Service Provider20%
Government6%
Financial Services Firm6%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business36%
Midsize Enterprise27%
Large Enterprise36%
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, IBM, Oracle and others in Application Server. Updated: May 2021.
511,773 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Magic xpa Application Platform is ranked 7th in Application Server with 1 review while Oracle WebLogic Server is ranked 3rd in Application Server with 3 reviews. Magic xpa Application Platform is rated 8.0, while Oracle WebLogic Server is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Magic xpa Application Platform writes "Mature solution that can be used on any platform and most databases are supported by it automatically". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle WebLogic Server writes "Flexibility and versatility make this product valuable while quarterly updates may impact stability". Magic xpa Application Platform is most compared with Microsoft .NET Framework, OutSystems, Apache Web Server, Microsoft Azure App Service and Xamarin Platform, whereas Oracle WebLogic Server is most compared with Oracle Application Server, Oracle Fusion Middleware, Tomcat, JBoss and Oracle GlassFish.

See our list of best Application Server vendors.

We monitor all Application Server reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.