Compare Magic xpa Application Platform vs. Oracle WebLogic Server

Magic xpa Application Platform is ranked 4th in Application Server with 4 reviews while Oracle WebLogic Server is ranked 3rd in Application Server with 1 review. Magic xpa Application Platform is rated 8.8, while Oracle WebLogic Server is rated 5.0. The top reviewer of Magic xpa Application Platform writes "Enables uncommonly fast development speed, bug-fix productivity, and connectivity to multiple databases". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle WebLogic Server writes "We need complete logs for a lot of different files. It has helped us to have different clusters within different servers". Magic xpa Application Platform is most compared with Microsoft .NET Framework, OutSystems and Xamarin Platform, whereas Oracle WebLogic Server is most compared with JBoss, Oracle GlassFish and Oracle Fusion Middleware.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, IBM, Oracle and others in Application Server. Updated: November 2019.
383,444 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The speed of development is the quickest for any tool on the market.Magic is rapid, it's a tool which we use to develop, change and maintain our programs. xpa has a lot more features onboard and it gives us the opportunity to do such things so that we can easily adapt and maintain our programs. It gives certain benefits to stay with our customers and the market.Typically an experienced Magic developer can do the work of two to three experienced C#/.NET developers. Customers are amazed at how quickly most new features can be added and bug fixes implemented. I have worked for four employers - including myself - using Magic, and in most instances, bug fixes are addressed and deployed in under six hours.Speed of development and database connectivity (MS SQL, Oracle, DB2, Btrieve/Pervasive PSQL, ODBC, MySql, and SQLite).The ability to use the same development environment for both Windows and Android applications. Magic xpa also supports iOS applications.Being able to make changes to existing programs to comply with last minute changes in requirements, and/or being able to fix, test, review, and deploy new code in a manner of hours instead of days, definitely gives us a huge advantage over our competitors and this is only possible thanks to Magic’s speed of programming.Magic’s unique approach to development ensures that the programmer stays focused on the objective of the program (i.e. display all customers in California), instead of the repetitive tasks that surround it (i.e. connect to database, open customers table, create the query to retrieve records within the specified criteria, fetch the result of the query, connect it to a data grid, etc.).Magic’s Database Gateway allows the logic of the program to be isolated from the underlying database. This provides the flexibility not only to move existing programs to different database environments without the need to change the logic in the program but also allows the programmer access to different databases without the need to know how to "talk" to them.

Read more »

The possibility of having several servers running, so we do not lose the service.It has helped us to have different clusters within different servers, which allows us to identify hacker attacks.

Read more »

Cons
The user interface could be improved to be more friendly for developers.When you have several tasks, you open a screen in a task in developing mode, and you don't see the parent screens. Debugging lacks the effects to solve problems. You have to do it first in a kind of studio. Then you have to be sure that you can do it in Magic because there is almost nothing to debug it. It's practically impossible to debug. You have to be sure before you put your snippets.The configuration of the xpa RIA mobile environment is complex and a discouragement to new developers. Also, Magic's documentation can be less than complete at times which leads to frustration for new developers. (I encourage new Magic developers to join the Magic Users Group).The Android environment is missing a number of functions for file/folder manipulation, sending receiving text messages (SMS) and the menuing options are limited. For now, it is left to the developer to write his/her own Java functions to include in the APK.It is missing basic charting tools for bar/pie/series charts. It is left to the developer to acquire and deploy charting tools or the customer to purchase a third-party reporting tool to produce charts.I would like to see a spell checker included with optional language support. Currently, this has to be purchased from a third-party.The ability to display page up, page down, top and bottom buttons along the scroll bar would make my mouse-reliant customers happy.Magic has a tradition, when it adds new technologies/features to the Magic development tool, to provide either no documentation or documentation that does not provide an organized approach for bringing this new technology/feature to experienced Magic programmers.

Read more »

The logs consultant, since it tends to be more in the server, we do need complete consult logs for a lot of different files.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
The cost for developers is high because you have to pay for licenses as well as runtime.It's not cheap. The licenses are not cheap. Not at all. They cost much money. There are other tools with free licenses but Magic asks for a lot of money.Magic is not the cheapest IDE out there. If you are considering Magic xpa, you should do a cost-benefit analysis to feel comfortable with your decision. The Magic sales staff is very helpful in providing pricing.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Server solutions are best for your needs.
383,444 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
4th
out of 22 in Application Server
Views
1,807
Comparisons
820
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
811
Avg. Rating
8.8
3rd
out of 22 in Application Server
Views
10,696
Comparisons
9,392
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
120
Avg. Rating
5.0
Top Comparisons
Compared 22% of the time.
Also Known As
uniPaaSWebLogic Application Server
Learn
Magic Software
Oracle
Overview
Magic xpa Application Platform is a code-free, visual development and deployment environment for the quick creation of enterprise-grade mobile, web and desktop apps. Magic xpa lets you leverage the same business logic to develop once and deploy across platforms. You can create a portfolio of high performance business apps with a single skill set and minimal resources. By allowing you to develop, maintain and update apps quickly and cost-effectively, Magic supports your digital transformation and enterprise mobility strategies, making it easy for you to give your business a competitive edge.

Oracle WebLogic Server 12c, the world’s first cloud-native, enterprise Java platform enables you to fully realize the benefits of cloud computing. Unique multitenancy capability drives massive consolidation. Lightweight microcontainer architecture drives application isolation and 100 percent portability between your private and public cloud. Multi data center high availability architecture protects against application disruption. Developer innovations with full Java EE 7 and Java SE8 support maximize DevOps productivity. Additionally, you continue to have access to the same platform on premises and in the cloud, via Oracle Java Cloud Service, which is based on Oracle WebLogic Server.

For more information on Oracle Weblogic Server, visit Oracle.com

Offer
Learn more about Magic xpa Application Platform
Learn more about Oracle WebLogic Server
Sample Customers
ADD, Cape plc, Adecco, Kuno Kinzoku Industry Co., GE Capital, Dove Tree, CBS Outdoor, Paris-Nord Villepinte Exhibition Center, Allstate Life Insurance Company, Titan Software SystemsColab Consulting Pty. Ltd., Infosys Ltd., Sascar, Banca Transilvania, UL, Center for Railway Information Systems, SPAR Austria Group, Reliance Commercial Finance, Industrial Bank of Korea, Al Jaber Group, Safe Water Kenya, Chhattisgarh Infotech and Biotech Promotion Society
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company48%
Financial Services Firm8%
Government7%
Media Company7%
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, IBM, Oracle and others in Application Server. Updated: November 2019.
383,444 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Application Server reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email