Compare Magic xpa Application Platform vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use TIBCO ActiveMatrix? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, IBM, Oracle and others in Application Server. Updated: August 2020.
431,275 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
The cost for developers is high because you have to pay for licenses as well as runtime.It's not cheap. The licenses are not cheap. Not at all. They cost much money. There are other tools with free licenses but Magic asks for a lot of money.

More Magic xpa Application Platform Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Server solutions are best for your needs.
431,275 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
6th
out of 23 in Application Server
Views
2,076
Comparisons
933
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
692
Avg. Rating
8.5
11th
out of 23 in Application Server
Views
652
Comparisons
571
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Compared 6% of the time.
Also Known As
uniPaaSActiveMatrix
Learn
Magic Software
TIBCO
Overview
Magic xpa Application Platform is a code-free, visual development and deployment environment for the quick creation of enterprise-grade mobile, web and desktop apps. Magic xpa lets you leverage the same business logic to develop once and deploy across platforms. You can create a portfolio of high performance business apps with a single skill set and minimal resources. By allowing you to develop, maintain and update apps quickly and cost-effectively, Magic supports your digital transformation and enterprise mobility strategies, making it easy for you to give your business a competitive edge.TIBCO ActiveMatrix provides tools for developing and packaging distributed applications, a distributed service execution environment, and tools for managing the runtime environment, applications and the services the applications provide. Service Grid is a comprehensive SOA development platform that transform business logic written in different programming languages into re-usable SOA services, and then assemble those services into powerful composite applications. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Grid is a scalable and extensible platform for developing, deploying, and managing applications that conform to a service-oriented architecture.
Offer
Learn more about Magic xpa Application Platform
Learn more about TIBCO ActiveMatrix
Sample Customers
ADD, Cape plc, Adecco, Kuno Kinzoku Industry Co., GE Capital, Dove Tree, CBS Outdoor, Paris-Nord Villepinte Exhibition Center, Allstate Life Insurance Company, Titan Software SystemsVodafone Hutchison Australia (VHA)
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, IBM, Oracle and others in Application Server. Updated: August 2020.
431,275 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Magic xpa Application Platform is ranked 6th in Application Server with 2 reviews while TIBCO ActiveMatrix is ranked 11th in Application Server. Magic xpa Application Platform is rated 8.6, while TIBCO ActiveMatrix is rated 0. The top reviewer of Magic xpa Application Platform writes "Has a lot more features onboard and it gives us the opportunity to do things so that we can easily adapt and maintain our programs". On the other hand, Magic xpa Application Platform is most compared with Microsoft .NET Framework, OutSystems, Mendix, Xamarin Platform and Apache Web Server, whereas TIBCO ActiveMatrix is most compared with Oracle SOA Suite, Oracle Fusion Middleware and Tomcat.

See our list of best Application Server vendors.

We monitor all Application Server reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.