Compare Magic xpa Application Platform vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Lifecycle Governance Framework
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The cost for developers is high because you have to pay for licenses as well as runtime."
More Magic xpa Application Platform Pricing and Cost Advice »
Information Not Available
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.
511,607 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Views
1,852
Comparisons
851
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
599
Rating
8.0
Views
76
Comparisons
36
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Compared 45% of the time.
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
uniPaaS
ActiveMatrix Lifecycle Governance Framework
Magic xpa Application Platform is a code-free, visual development and deployment environment for the quick creation of enterprise-grade mobile, web and desktop apps. Magic xpa lets you leverage the same business logic to develop once and deploy across platforms. You can create a portfolio of high performance business apps with a single skill set and minimal resources. By allowing you to develop, maintain and update apps quickly and cost-effectively, Magic supports your digital transformation and enterprise mobility
strategies, making it easy for you to give your business a competitive edge.
The TIBCO ActiveMatrix Lifecycle Governance product does not come with any user licenses. Customers will need to purchase either named user licenses, concurrent user licenses, or any mixture of the two as outlined below. Requires the customer to have a valid license for either the production or developer versions of the TIBCO ActiveMatrix Lifecycle Governance product. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Lifecycle Governance Framework provides design-time governance that includes everything required for service lifecycle management. Included in the platform are an SOA registry, metadata repository for service artifacts, service lifecycle management tools, service contract management, and design-time policy/validation management. The product also comes with a plug-in that allows Visual Studio or Eclipse developers to interact directly with registry or repository from their IDE.
Learn more about Magic xpa Application Platform
Learn more about TIBCO ActiveMatrix Lifecycle Governance Framework
ADD, Cape plc, Adecco, Kuno Kinzoku Industry Co., GE Capital, Dove Tree, CBS Outdoor, Paris-Nord Villepinte Exhibition Center, Allstate Life Insurance Company, Titan Software Systems
Arbeitsmarktservice, Hangzhou Municipal Government, Harlow District Council, Social Security Administration, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
Comms Service Provider42%
Computer Software Company13%
Insurance Company11%
Financial Services Firm5%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Microsoft, F5 and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: June 2021.
511,607 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Magic xpa Application Platform is ranked 15th in Application Infrastructure with 1 review while TIBCO ActiveMatrix Lifecycle Governance Framework is ranked 31st in Application Infrastructure. Magic xpa Application Platform is rated 8.0, while TIBCO ActiveMatrix Lifecycle Governance Framework is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Magic xpa Application Platform writes "Mature solution that can be used on any platform and most databases are supported by it automatically". On the other hand, Magic xpa Application Platform is most compared with Microsoft .NET Framework, OutSystems, Apache Web Server, Microsoft Azure App Service and Xamarin Platform, whereas TIBCO ActiveMatrix Lifecycle Governance Framework is most compared with .
See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.