Magic xpi Integration Platform vs. Mule ESB Comparison

Magic xpi Integration Platform

Mule ESB

Magic xpi Integration Platform

Read 1 Magic xpi Integration Platform review.

1,292 views|857 comparisons

Mule ESB

Read 10 Mule ESB reviews.

23,577 views|16,310 comparisons

Most Helpful Review

Use Magic xpi Integration Platform? Share your opinion.

JustinJames

IT Consultant at a financial services firm

Easy to implement and supports platforms like Windows, Linux, and Mac

One of the important features of Mule ESB as an enterprise architect is that it should be scalable. It should be customizable for different kinds... Read more »

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, MuleSoft, Boomi and others in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS). Updated: December 2020.

Download now

455,301 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The stability of the solution is OK." More Magic xpi Integration Platform Pros »	"The most powerful feature is DataWeave, which is a powerful language where data can be transformed from one form into another.""Once it is started, we don't see any problems on a day to day basis.""The most valuable feature of Mule ESB is data transformation, i.e. our interacting with different systems and orchestrating for our business needs.""The most valuable feature is the Salesforce integration.""The connectivity the solution provides is excellent. There are often too many systems that we have to integrate and this helps with that.""Easy connectivity and easy integration.""The transformation and the data format are the features that I like the most.""The most valuable feature for Mule is the number of connectors that are available." More Mule ESB Pros »
Cons
"It is not performing well." More Magic xpi Integration Platform Cons »	"I would like to see support for BPM in the next release of this solution.""We would like to have a built-in logging framework in which we can do auditing.""Mule ESB is more into the latest REST APIs, not much into the SOAP web services. Developing is all about web services and not easy with Mule.""The Anypoint platform consumes a lot of memory, and it would be great for developers if it were more lightweight.""The solution isn't as stable as we'd like it to be. There are some ongoing issues and therefore Mule has to provide frequent patches. Mule's core IP should be more stable overall.""Lacking some connectors that could be included.""It's not easy to troubleshoot and we still can't make it work.""MuleSoft is not so strong in method-based integration, so they're not so functional in that regard." More Mule ESB Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available	"The various features and components for this solution are no longer free.""The licensing is yearly, and there are additional fees for services.""This product is cheaper than some offered by other vendors, although there is a problem because you have to pay for some third-party adapters." More Mule ESB Pricing and Cost Advice »

See Which Vendors Are Best For You Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs. See Recommendations 455,301 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question Earn 20 points	What do you like most about Mule ESB? Top Answer: The connectivity the solution provides is excellent. There are often too many systems that we have to integrate and this helps with that. Read all 6 answers What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Mule ESB? Top Answer: I'm unsure of the licensing costs. I believe the total price is less than IBM, but it's still rather expensive. Read all 2 answers What needs improvement with Mule ESB? Top Answer: I'm not sure of any areas Mule ESB needs to improve. The price of the solution is a little bit high. It would be helpful if different sized businesses had access to different plans. The solution isn't… more » Read all 7 answers
Ranking
10th out of 33 in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) Views 1,292 Comparisons 857 Reviews 1 Average Words per Review 111 Rating 3.0	1st out of 24 in ESB Views 23,577 Comparisons 16,310 Reviews 10 Average Words per Review 513 Rating 7.2
Popular Comparisons
Mule Anypoint Platform vs. Magic xpi Integration Platform Compared 17% of the time. SSIS vs. Magic xpi Integration Platform Compared 17% of the time. Talend Data Management Platform vs. Magic xpi Integration Platform Compared 15% of the time. SAP Process Orchestration vs. Magic xpi Integration Platform Compared 13% of the time. Boomi AtomSphere Integration vs. Magic xpi Integration Platform Compared 6% of the time. See more Magic xpi Integration Platform competitors » + Add more products to compare	webMethods Integration Server vs. Mule ESB Compared 23% of the time. IBM Integration Bus vs. Mule ESB Compared 22% of the time. Red Hat Fuse vs. Mule ESB Compared 9% of the time. Oracle Service Bus vs. Mule ESB Compared 8% of the time. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus vs. Mule ESB Compared 6% of the time. See more Mule ESB competitors » + Add more products to compare
Also Known As
Magic xpi Integration Platform, iBOLT
Learn
Magic Software	MuleSoft
Overview
Magic xpi Integration Platform is a total solution for integrating, automating and transforming the data of your business applications. The intuitive and easy-to-use interface, including 100+ pre-built connectors, makes it ideal for all types of users, from business users and citizen integrators to IT experts. Magic’s end-to-end tailored solutions are a great fit for all types of IT infrastructures, supporting all of the on-premise, cloud and hybrid integration needs of organizations around the world.	For companies looking to modernize and unlock the value of existing on-premises systems and applications, an enterprise service bus (ESB) architecture serves as a critical foundation layer for SOA. When deployed as an ESB, the Mule runtime engine of Anypoint Platform combines the power of data and application integration across legacy systems and SaaS applications, with a seamless path to the other capabilities of Anypoint Platform and the full power of API-led connectivity.
Offer
Learn more about Magic xpi Integration Platform Learn More	Learn more about Mule ESB Learn More
Sample Customers
Godrej Properties	Ube, PacificComp, University of Witwatersrand, Justice Systems, Camelot
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS Computer Software Company34% Comms Service Provider23% Media Company9% Educational Organization8%	VISITORS READING REVIEWS Computer Software Company40% Comms Service Provider14% Financial Services Firm6% Energy/Utilities Company5%
Company Size
No Data Available	REVIEWERS Small Business38% Midsize Enterprise12% Large Enterprise50% VISITORS READING REVIEWS Small Business23% Midsize Enterprise4% Large Enterprise73%

Magic xpi Integration Platform is ranked 10th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 1 review while Mule ESB is ranked 1st in ESB with 10 reviews. Magic xpi Integration Platform is rated 3.0, while Mule ESB is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of Magic xpi Integration Platform writes "A low-performing integration tool". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mule ESB writes "Easy to implement and supports platforms like Windows, Linux, and Mac". Magic xpi Integration Platform is most compared with Mule Anypoint Platform, SSIS, Talend Data Management Platform, SAP Process Orchestration and Boomi AtomSphere Integration, whereas Mule ESB is most compared with webMethods Integration Server, IBM Integration Bus, Red Hat Fuse, Oracle Service Bus and TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus.

See our list of .

We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Compare Magic xpi Integration Platform vs. Mule ESB