We performed a comparison between Magic xpi Integration Platform and Mule ESB based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft, Microsoft, Oracle and others in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)."The stability of the solution is OK."
"The cloud and integration abilities are most useful allowing us to use applications such as Salesforce and DataWeave."
"The solution offers multiple deployment options."
"I am impressed with the product's connectors and scalability."
"The architecture based on events has several connectors which allow integration from external and internal applications of the company."
"The most valuable feature is the Salesforce integration."
"It was pretty fast to develop APIs on this platform, which is something I liked about it. So, the time to value was pretty good."
"We can use Java expressions anywhere in the flow."
"The solution's drag-and-drop interface and data viewer helped us quite a lot."
"It is not performing well."
"From the product perspective, it was sometimes hard to manage the dependencies. When we had to add dependencies on a couple of different packages, it was sometimes confusing. It was hard to update them with Anypoint Studio, as well as with MuleSoft. There were challenges with that. So, that's one of the areas that could be improved."
"The current version will not be supported for much longer."
"The price of Mule ESB could improve."
"In the next release, I would like to see improvement in the generator for the DataWeave language so that it's a little more graphic."
"We would like the ability to use our own code. This would allow us to develop customizations with ease. Additionally, it would be nice to have more analytics or insights on the exchanged information between databases."
"I would like to see support for BPM in the next release of this solution."
"The Anypoint platform consumes a lot of memory, and it would be great for developers if it were more lightweight."
"The payment system needs improvement."
Earn 20 points
Magic xpi Integration Platform is ranked 23rd in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) while Mule ESB is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 45 reviews. Magic xpi Integration Platform is rated 3.0, while Mule ESB is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Magic xpi Integration Platform writes "A low-performing integration tool". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mule ESB writes "Plenty of documentation, flexible, and reliable". Magic xpi Integration Platform is most compared with , whereas Mule ESB is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, Oracle Service Bus, Oracle SOA Suite, Red Hat Fuse and webMethods Integration Server.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.