MagicBox vs TalentLMS comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Magic EdTech Logo
57 views|25 comparisons
Epignosis Logo
496 views|228 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between MagicBox and TalentLMS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about CYPHER LEARNING, Moodle, Google and others in Learning Management Systems (LMS).
To learn more, read our detailed Learning Management Systems (LMS) Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "You can't beat this solution for the price."
  • More TalentLMS Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Learning Management Systems (LMS) solutions are best for your needs.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The setup for TalentLMS is easier than Cypher LMS.
    Top Answer:The pricing is less than Cypher LMS. It is three times less.
    Top Answer:The problem with TalentLMS is that it has some bugs. If you need to upload an image, then it will cause trouble. It is not actually stable. Another drawback of the LMS systems is that they are not… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    57
    Comparisons
    25
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    496
    Comparisons
    228
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    928
    Rating
    7.0
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    MagicBox is an end-to-end digital publishing platform and mobile distribution platform that enables publishers, authors and content providers to create, sell, manage and deliver their digital content through custom branded Web & Mobile Apps.

    TalentLMS is an award-winning Learning Management System (LMS) ideal for delivering engaging online training. Create courses in a few clicks in a platform suitable for sophisticated as well as inexperienced, aspiring trainers. TalentLMS combines support for multiple file types and multimedia (presentations, videos, iFrame, SCORM, etc.) with simplicity, and an always eager-to-help support team. Be the driver of your team's potential.

    Sample Customers
    academic, freelancers, k-12, higher education, school and districts, corporate
    DeLonghi, Infosys, Rosetta Stone, Harper Collins Publishers, Zalora, Triton Aerospace, Smart Aviation Services
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Government10%
    Hospitality Company9%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise61%
    Buyer's Guide
    Learning Management Systems (LMS)
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about CYPHER LEARNING, Moodle, Google and others in Learning Management Systems (LMS). Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    MagicBox is ranked 57th in Learning Management Systems (LMS) while TalentLMS is ranked 9th in Learning Management Systems (LMS) with 3 reviews. MagicBox is rated 0.0, while TalentLMS is rated 7.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of TalentLMS writes "Good automation and dashboards with helpful customer support". MagicBox is most compared with , whereas TalentLMS is most compared with CYPHER Learning, Moodle and SAP SuccessFactors Learning.

    See our list of best Learning Management Systems (LMS) vendors.

    We monitor all Learning Management Systems (LMS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.