Compare Magnolia CMS vs. SharePoint

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Magnolia CMS Logo
1,030 views|944 comparisons
SharePoint Logo
33,241 views|27,980 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Liferay, Oracle and others in Web Content Management. Updated: February 2021.
464,369 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"The pricing works for us.""For this type of solution, it is not wise to buy it without Software Assurance."

More SharePoint Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
464,369 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
8th
Views
1,030
Comparisons
944
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
1st
Views
33,241
Comparisons
27,980
Reviews
16
Average Words per Review
361
Rating
7.7
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
SharePoint 2007, SharePoint 2010
Learn More
Overview

Combining the technical excellence of an open suite with highly effective features for your business needs, Magnolia CMS is the perfect tool for both your marketing and IT teams.

SharePoint is a Microsoft-based platform for building web applications. It covers a widerange of capabilities and while it is appropriate for experienced webdevelopers, even non-technical minded users can easily navigate through thesystem and execute functions such as collaborating data, managing documents andfiles, creating websites, managing social networking solutions, and automatingworkflow.

Major areas that SharePoint deals with are websites,communities, content, search, insights, and composites. The purpose is to give usersthe ability to create or develop these key business components on their owneven without technical knowledge of, for example, how to build a website or howto integrate coding. Configuring SharePoint into a business's system is meantto cut out all of the complicated steps, and pave the way for easierimplementation all around.

Offer
Learn more about Magnolia CMS
Learn more about SharePoint
Sample Customers
Ancestry.com, Migros, MOO, Al Arabiya, Alior Bank, Atlassian, Avis
Toyota, Aeroports de Paris, ASBBank Ltd., Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals, CambridgeshireConstabulary, D&M Group, NPL Construction Company, and The Regional Municipality of Niagara.
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Comms Service Provider19%
Media Company8%
Insurance Company5%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm12%
Energy/Utilities Company10%
University10%
Comms Service Provider8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company24%
Comms Service Provider15%
Government10%
Financial Services Firm5%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business38%
Midsize Enterprise21%
Large Enterprise41%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business2%
Midsize Enterprise26%
Large Enterprise72%
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Liferay, Oracle and others in Web Content Management. Updated: February 2021.
464,369 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Magnolia CMS is ranked 8th in Web Content Management while SharePoint is ranked 1st in Web Content Management with 12 reviews. Magnolia CMS is rated 0.0, while SharePoint is rated 7.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of SharePoint writes "Plan, plan, plan. Over-budget". Magnolia CMS is most compared with WordPress, Drupal, Sitecore Experience Manager, Adobe CQ5 and dotCMS, whereas SharePoint is most compared with WordPress, Citrix ShareFile, Box, OpenText Content Suite Platform and OpenText Documentum.

See our list of best Web Content Management vendors.

We monitor all Web Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.