Compare MailChimp vs. Mandrill

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
MailChimp Logo
1,619 views|1,268 comparisons
Mandrill Logo
336 views|306 comparisons
Ranking
4th
out of 22 in Cloud Email
Views
1,619
Comparisons
1,268
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
10th
out of 22 in Cloud Email
Views
336
Comparisons
306
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

MailChimp is an email marketing service with more than 5 million users around the world. Design, send, and track email newsletters from anywhere. And since MailChimp is built to support lists with millions of subscribers, we'll scale with your company.

Mandrill is a reliable, scalable, and secure delivery API for transactional emails from websites and applications. It's ideal for sending data-driven transactional emails, including targeted e-commerce and personalized one-to-one messages.
Offer
Learn more about MailChimp
Learn more about Mandrill
Sample Customers
The Atlantic, WNYC, Sierra Nevada, New York Times
SoundCloud, Envato, Trello
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Marketing Services Firm29%
Media Company14%
Financial Services Firm14%
Non Profit14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider43%
Computer Software Company27%
Media Company5%
Outsourcing Company5%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business80%
Midsize Enterprise10%
Large Enterprise10%
No Data Available

MailChimp is ranked 4th in Cloud Email while Mandrill is ranked 10th in Cloud Email. MailChimp is rated 0.0, while Mandrill is rated 0.0. On the other hand, MailChimp is most compared with Amazon SES, SendGrid, Zoho Campaigns, Mailgun and SendPulse, whereas Mandrill is most compared with SendinBlue and Amazon SES.

See our list of best Cloud Email vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Email reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.